Previous 11 - 20 Next
In response to:

White Privilege

Chip. Wrote: May 28, 2014 1:07 AM
Given the prominence television has in our lives, it would seem the only way to teach modern day white people how to not feel guilt about themselves is to allow television broadcasters to portray minorities and radical left wing types in the same manner of caricatures, with subtle and overt negative innuendos that television applies to white people. And it's not just white guilt that is being taught. It is also minority vindictiveness against imaginary wrongs. Such new broadcasting would be a lot more true and representative of reality, in my view, given the better character of white people in terms of their better ability to function as productive and law abiding citizens, and the fact their Christian benevolence uplifted minorities in this country. It would be a much needed cold slap in the face. Alas, and perhaps thankfully so, our society is too polite to do this, unless it is to white people, that is. The natural consequence of a creating a more just society is not the eventual creation of an enforced multiracial society, and certainly not of a anti-white society, but rather the fact that minorities can have the same legal rights as anyone else, and no more. This means they may still suffer certain disadvantages wherever they remain minorities, such as those suffered by crows who cannot swim with penguins or hummingbirds that cannot fly with albatrosses, but no one should ever try to pass a law that says birds of a feather shall not flock together, or that all birds of any feather shall flock together. There is another principle in American law and society, and that is to leave a free people alone.
jmg11, the thing to remember here in this conversation is, that which separates those who can engage in a forthright and constructive dialogue from those who cannot, is the same thing that separates the men from the .. boys.
Overall a good column, to be clear, particularly about giving recognition. Only real gripe is with all the talk about PTSD, there is so little specific talk about what prevents or cures it. Some have said that a warm welcome home and recognition would have prevented PTSD. Others have said that certain specific therapies, such as placing a finger near the eyes and slowly moving it back, would help a lot. Recently, someone has claimed that in the case of being wrongfully treated, the victim of PTSD should envision the wrongdoer fully and completely expressing remorse. This is all a mainstream civvi knows, in the hearsay, if that much. As for "accidents" being a cause for PTSD, I can sure believe that, because once a fatal auto accident occurred a half mile in front of me--though but for my good fortune it could have as easily occurred where I was-- I stopped and tried to help, then went on my way when others took over. And, until I recoverred 3-5 days later, I was seriously wondering, when stopping at those tranquil highway rest stops, why everyone was so casual about driving cars when there was so much danger on the roads. But I did recover quickly, maybe because I already have been a driver for many years and could put things into perspective. Maybe other situations are not so simple, and that is where the problem lay, in the more-difficult-to-put-into-perspective situations, and where the solution and insight ought to be sought.
If all these things are done, should we get back to you and let you know if it worked?
I wonder if Guinness will recognize "world's most successful race hustler" as one of it's categories. But if even BHO can't spare $20K a year to keep a big campaign promise, it must not be much of an accomplishment by any measure. And that, boys and girls, is the moral to the story.
This column is thought-provoking but I find it hard to believe that any air superiority fighter could ever be given serious consideration as a replacement for a dedicated ground attack plane such as the A-10. The purpose of an air superiority fighter is to clear the skies of enemy air power, to allow dedicated ground attack planes to do their work. But since the primary purpose of the A-10 was to knock out tanks, perhaps either Apache ground attack helicopters or heavily armed drones may be better suited to torching rags hiding under rocks. But, now that I am thinking, last i heard was that most of the Apaches were being moved out of state national guard units (not sure what use the National Guard would have for an A-10, by the way) and placed under stateside Army control. And, if there is a replacement for the A-10, what is it now? I suppose this is not an urgent question given that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are pretty much over. But worth asking. I like the sound of commanders taking responsibility for the failures of their command, but seriously, when was the last time that happened?... But wait a minute... you know what does happen these days?... Senior commanding generals are being purged out of the military left and right for very questionable infractions, including a large number of generals in charge of our nuclear assets. So why not here, too, just to keep the practice of dismissing a commander for any excuse, consistent? But if the problem is the structure of the VA itself, as the author seems to suggest when he writes that this institution is giving us a preview of the single payer system, then what solution is offered here? Should Medicare without reduced reimbursement rates, simply be extended to disabled vets?
This column is thought-provoking but I find it hard to believe that any air superiority fighter could ever be given serious consideration as a replacement for a dedicated ground attack plane such as the A-10. The purpose of an air superiority fighter is to clear the skies of enemy air power, to allow dedicated ground attack planes to do their work. But since the primary purpose of the A-10 was to knock out tanks, perhaps either Apache ground attack helicopters or heavily armed drones may be better suited to torching rags hiding under rocks. But, now that I am thinking, last i heard was that most of the Apaches were being moved out of state national guard units (not sure what use the National Guard would have for an A-10, by the way) and placed under stateside Army control. And, if there is a replacement for the A-10, what is it now? I suppose this is not an urgent question given that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are pretty much over. But worth asking. I like the sound of commanders taking responsibility for the failures of their command, but seriously, when was the last time that happened?... But wait a minute... you know what does happen these days?... Senior commanding generals are being purged out of the military left and right for very questionable infractions, including a large number of generals in charge of our nuclear assets. So why not here, too, just to keep the practice of dismissing a commander for any excuse, consistent? But if the problem is the structure of the VA itself, as the author seems to suggest when he writes that this institution is giving us a preview of the single payer system, then what solution is offered here? Should Medicare without reduced reimbursement rates, simply be extended to disabled vets?
When it comes to people who already have their minds made up about what their position is, and they know it is wrong, there is a certain game that they will play, and that game is to invite dialogue.
The real trend is that Christians eventually free people, while pagans enslave people. Another likely trend is that modern, industrialized societies, do not really benefit from slavery (Islamic countries, Red China, USSR, and Nazi Germany excepted because they are pagan and/or were short term experimental societies). Towards the end of the days of slavery in the South, the only thing profitable from slave ownership was cotton growing. As for a direct discussion on race, that would seem impossible, because race hustlers are driven by will and self-interest and not by reason, and so will always only say anything to get the upper hand. There won't be any reason or principles in a "discussion on race".
In response to:

The Forgotten Massacre

Chip. Wrote: May 24, 2014 10:40 PM
TH should pass out merit ribbons to all the oh-so-good left wing fanatics and their brain washed borgs who grace this sometimes conservative website, and put us evil conservatives in our place. Otherwise, it must be a thankless job.
In response to:

The Forgotten Massacre

Chip. Wrote: May 24, 2014 8:52 PM
You' wouldn't be capable of doing much more if you tried to "pop" me, This "forgotten massacre" has been in the mainstream for close to 20 years, Documentaries about it have been aired since then on the Military Cjhannell and other outlets. There is no forgotten omission here that the public needs reminding of. There is only the opportunity for the PC crowd to use it to further their own political agendas. by spoon feeding their versions of it to idiots like you.
Previous 11 - 20 Next