It is common knowledge that most "green" technologies that are not already mainstream are not yet economically viable, and unless a lot of things change, everyone knows that spending a large part of anyone's budget on "green" measures is a certain pathway to financial collapse. Which is the whole object of BHO, Van Jones, and the whole lot of them. And they'll be the only ones patting those on the back who actually bought useless 100K+ Teslas or Fiskers. They paid top dollar for useless technology, and the fools think they are saving the planet! It is hard to believe, but useful idiots are born every minute.

In a free market economy, wouldn't that mean that the politicians are all for sale? Wouldn't illegal aliens motivated by economic factors start to believe they have more rights than native born citizens? When immigration laws are not enforced, wouldn't employers hire illegal aliens whenever they could do so, or else go out of business? Wouldn't suppliers no longer affected by tariffs, always buy their manufactured products from the slave-supported economies of the third world, than from hard working American manufacturers who provide good living wages? That's immoral In a free market economy, nationality, culture, quality of life, mean absolutely nothing. Without common sense REGULATION that is ENFORCED. Got it, free marketeers?

"Obama has outlawed all discussion or study of jihad, Islamism, radical Islam and the Koran by U.S. federal government agencies." If this statement is true, then it would be much more useful if it was supported by relevant facts. It would make a quite good subject for a column all by itself.

Ecclesiastes 6:11

"They see Islamic dress as preserving the dignity of their women; we see it as suffocating and oppressive" "Islamic dress" is just the byproduct of the wicked Islamic practice of bigamy. With each head honcho mudslum male wedded to several clueless Islamic women, the unwed males in the society present an undue pressure on women who are, but should not be, already married. Hence the stopgap measure of "Islamic dress" for women in Islamic societies. Unseen, they do not exist in the minds of the unwed Islamic men.

"They see Islamic dress as preserving the dignity of their women; we see it as suffocating and oppressive" "Islamic dress" is just the byproduct of the wicked Islamic practice of bigamy. With each head honcho mudslum male wedded to several clueless Islamic women, the unwed males in the society present an undue pressure on women who are, but should not be, already married. Hence the stopgap measure of "Islamic dress" for women in Islamic societies. Unseen, they do not exist in the minds of the unwed Islamic men.

The point of this column is that it is wrong to say that every evil thing a white person does proves all whites are collectively guilty, while at the same time as saying that when white people are attacked, it is done so for "a variety of reasons", when we know equivalent logic would be to claim that all non-white people are collectively guilty. Neither side is logical, but those who are ambivalent, on either side, are, in fact, collectively guilty.

The textbook intentionally deprives students of the means to address the questions posed by presenting only very superficial arguments and filling in the void with the idea that each side has a valid point of view. It teaches nothing. It shouldn't require an interested group, such as the rabbi mentioned here, to point this out, But at least someone is. Most people these days woundn't have a clue one way or the other, and textbooks like this one keep it that way. To answer its question, I'd suggest studying the history of Islam towards other peoples, whether Moslems ever did anything without the sword. Any time moral equivalence or superiority is claimed, all one needs to do is look at and know the other side.

We (the USA) have rushed to the aid of.. blacks in South Africa, and demanded the end of apartheid. Same thing in Zimbabwe. We bombed Serbia into submission so they back off of Kosovo, or support the overthrow the Ghaddafi regime when he threatens those Al Queda controlled rebels who revolt against his government. If these past actioons were so good, then why is it that when Christians in Chaldea (Iraq), Sudan, Nigeria, Lebanon, Syria, and Egypt are threatened, and either driven into extinction or driven out of their countries, we did nothing to stop it? So it would appear our government will pay for the nails. It appears that's what the US government is being used for these days.

"1) The profession promotes a MARXIST philosophy ... places a higher priority on political philosophy than on the clients’ mental health." "It has little to do with real answers, because the mental health professionals have no answers. The focus is on money." The Rosetta stone Dr. Loudin needs is a book titled: The Soviet Art of Brainwashing. It reveals its purpose is to degrade society, partly through Communist-oriented psychiatric "healing" that heals no one. Practical psychological healing methods, specificly taught by William James, Mary Baker Eddy, Pentecostal faith healers, must be discredited. It has everything to do with real answers because it cannot exist without explicitly suppressing them.