Previous 11 - 20 Next
are you really this misinformed?
Also Ayers and associates did not target the political leaders with who they disagreed, they targeted ordinary citizens who had no control of the situation and who could not change it if they so desired, and they did it to create fear in the population, which is terrorism, and George Washington did not target the innocent as Ayers did.
Legal and illegal are concepts that are based on what the current political leaders impose as law. How about RIGHT and WRONG, based on morality, and when the government attempts to strip the God given RIGHTS from people and take their choices away, it is WRONG. Freedom is the RIGHT to CHOSE for oneself, not have "central planners" DICTATE how we will live. Ayers needs to read the declaration of independence a few times and allow it to sink in. IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776. The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness........http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transcript.html
SECURE THE BORDER AND ENFORCE OUR LAWS. We don't have an immigration problem, WE HAVE A LAW ENFORCEMENT PROBLEM. Congress promised in 1986 to SECURE the border and that the AMNESTY given then was the LAST ONE. NO AMNESTY, NO LEGALIZATION, NO GREEN CARD WORKER PROGRAM, NO GOVERNMENT BENEFITS, NO JOBS, NOTHING FOR ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS AND THEIR CHILDREN. AND NO EFFING VOTE EVER FOR THOSE WHO WILLINGLY BREAK OUR LAWS AND COME HERE ILLEGALLY.
These Illegal Alien invaders coming here scoff our laws and country, and demand that we accept and support them. THEY LACK THE KIND OF CHARACTER that AMERICANS seek in immigrants who want to come and live the American dream. SECURE THE BORDER AND ENFORCE OUR LAWS. We don't have an "immigration" problem, we have a "LAW ENFORCEMENT" problem. No government benefits for illegal aliens or their children, NO JOBS, NO BENEFITS, NO CITIZENSHIP, NO LEGALIZATION, NO NOTHING.....AND NO VOTE EVER FOR THOSE WHO WILLINGLY BREAK OUR LAWS TO BENEFIT THEMSELVES......
this entire article simply illustrates why liberalism is a MENTAL DISORDER. Liberals have defective and irrational thinking, and would become conservatives if they were forced to go to a psychologist and learn rational thinking where they stopped blaming everyone else for "their feelings", learned to think rationally about things and accept responsibility for their own thinking and "feelings". Liberal think like little children, who have never grown up and accepted the world as it is, rather than how they would like it to be, which is why they always want things to be "fair", when the world is not fair and will never be fair. Liberals are mentally defective and responsible adults should never allow their irrational arguments to over rule rational and logical adult thoughts and actions, because liberal policies have destructive unintended consequences, which the liberals then promptly blame on others...
In response to:

Amnesty Lite Is Still Amnesty

ChillytheAlaskan Wrote: Jun 13, 2014 3:15 PM
It seem obvious the democrats loved Cantor, he was doing their bidding, why would they want him out? If the republican establishment does not support Brat with funding as well as votes, it will prove THEY PREFER DEMOCRATS IF THEY CAN'T HAVE A RINO, and that the establishment republicans are nothing but DEMOCRATS IN DISGUISE and need to be PURGED FROM THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. So what if they have money? George Soros has money, does that make him a REPUBLICAN? We need candidates that SUPPORT REPUBLICAN VALUES, NOT DEMOCRATS POSING AS REPUBLICANS WITH MONEY TO CAMPAIGN.
What do you call those H1B holders but job stealers when we have so many HIGHLY QUALIFIED AMERICANS currently out of work? He is right on with his assessment and is REPRESENTING AMERICANS not large multi national corporate interests. The following comment from a forum discussion I provided some links to, says it all. JQAdams great links...I love this comment Steve, Nothing to do with Ukraine. Instead, immigration and Silicon Valley. Yesterday, Facebook announced it had acquired WhatsApp for $19 billion. WhatsApp had two founders, both former staff software engineers for Yahoo. Amazingly, both tried to get jobs at Facebook, and at least one at Twitter, but neither was hired. Zuckerberg wants to re-engineer the American population in the name of a supposed shortage of "qualified" domestic engineers. And yet Facebook's hiring system is so screwed up, it can't even recognize superb, highly experienced, U.S. citizen software engineers when they walk in the door asking for a job. They could've had the founders for maybe $100K/yr each. Instead, they ended up pa ying $19 B. And we're supposed to trust this guy's opinion on whether there are enough good engineers? Unbelievable. Please write about this. Spread the word. THE UNITED STATES DOES NOT HAVE A SHORTAGE OF STEM WORKERS, BIG CORPORATIONS ARE ATTEMPTING TO DESTROY THE WAGES AND STANDARD OF LIVING BY ABUSING THE H1B VISA.
And this applied to Esquire, and ANY member of the BAR association, meaning lawyers that joined the BAR and accepted the title ESQUIRE would lose their citizenship.
Congress proposed a Title of Nobility Amendment in 1789 which did not pass. Congress tried again in 1810. This time it passed through Congress and was submitted to the States for ratification. If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them. - True 13th Amendment A considerable controversy has arisen concerning whether or not the Amendment was ratified. Newly located documents verify the ratification was properly done. http://www.constitutionalconcepts.org/13thamend-%20facts.htm http://www.constitutionalconcepts.org/13thamend-%20chrono.htm
Previous 11 - 20 Next