In response to:

Abortion Strips A Woman’s Free Choice

chicaree Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 8:11 PM
When republicans are willing to step up and provide for those unwanted children of mothers who cannot afford them, who are not in a stable relationship to nurture a child, or simply do not want the child. If the mother is saying I cannot care of this infant, then who does care for it, the government. Only when you decide to spend more money on that 40% that you call "feeding off the government", can republicans speak with authority about making unwilling mothers bear children they cannot care for.
jlucas Wrote: Jan 22, 2013 9:12 AM
There is this thing called adoption!!
scrow Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 11:12 PM
So the poor aren't entitled to speak against abortion?

Since the argument is that only people who can spend more money on the 40% are allowed to "speak with authority"?
rhough Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:20 PM
I would say that compared to Dems and misaligned Republicans, conservative Republicans do step up and seek to make provision for the unborn, the poor, the homeless and on and on. It is statistically provable that Republicans are more charitable in every way without the compulsion of the law to 'make 'em do so'. On the other hand, Dems promote perversity in every form and even enable and applaud people to continue in ways that are destructive to themselves and the further degradation of society. AND... to top that off... work to force others to pay for the continuous bad choices people make.
Earl29 Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:23 PM
Yes, quite true.
Perhaps you can tell me why people like chicares never answer my simple little question.
Panda Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 10:41 PM
Because you're not capable of dumbing yourself down enough to ask a question simple enough for chickaree to comprehend....
Earl29 Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:13 PM
Ron is right.
But I can't get an answer to this question from people who bring up your point, chic. Because I cannot support you, do I have no right to object to someone else killing you?
Earl29 Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:12 PM
Ron is right.
But I can't get an answer to this question from people who bring up your point, chic. Because I cannot support you, do I have no right to object to someone else killing you?
Ron-CA Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 8:16 PM
Don't look now Chicaree but we ARE paying for them.

The way to end abortion is to show women that abortion strips them of freedom. Abortion does not preserve choice; abortion pollutes choice.

Not All Free Choices Are Beneficial

Killing in the name of freedom does not preserve one’s own freedom. Women nearly always have the freedom to kill; they do not always have the right to kill.

Pro-choice activists tell women that in order to preserve their freedom, they must defend their right to kill their children. But the question is not whether an act is committed freely, but whether it is an objectively good act. If you freely...