Previous 21 - 30 Next
In response to:

A Korean Nightmare

Chicago Undercover Wrote: Apr 08, 2013 2:40 PM
"But I think a tactical nuke on Kim Young 'un at home would be most effective. One shot, one kill, who's next? " The problem with that is it isn't just one kill we're talking about. Even a tactical nuke in Pyongyang, would take out hundreds, maybe a small thousands of people. In our bloodlust, let's just be honest, ok?
I am absolutely ashamed of this country's "leaders"....almost every single one of them. And none to proud of about 47% of the sheople. Be prepared, folks, because this is NOT going to go well. And it's going to go haywire, not just in our life times, but in 2013 I suspect.
We're going to lose this....and several others, as well....argument. Simple as that. What SHOULD be happening is of no consequence, because the people that can enforce it are the very ones perpetrating the acts. We have no one, in D.C., that is truly willing to stand up to the progressive machine. Because standing up, MAY require something more than words. We have no one who has the stones to say "give me xxxxxx or give me death". There will be no border enforcement. There simply will not be, as pathetic as that is, because we have no one who is willing to stand up to the dictators and say "over my dead body. So, bring a gun when you vote." We will also see gay marriage "legalized by June; The "debt ceiling" raised again my $.02
They already did that in 1986. The fact of the matter is that the Republican party and the democratic party are BOTH vying for the Hispanic vote and are only concerned with being elected and staying in positions of authority. With relatively few exceptions. There is only one solution to this trajectory our nation is on. Pray - and duck and cover, because we are in a downward spiral and the vortex sucking is down is only getting stronger. There is no turning this boat around now.
Well, there is one thing I agree with.....there is no "rational" reason for Christianity. God is more than rational, and our finite brains cannot fathom it. So, the fact that we cannot rationalize Christinaity is really the argument FOR it. For the rest of your points, here is counterpoint: equality of all citizens under the law - already HAVE it. To deny that is intellectually dishonest. protection against discrimination based on sexuality - ditto. It's part of the law already. provide stability to homosexual relationships and families - BS. There is ZERO proof that "marriage" provides familial stability. the divorce rate is updarwds of 60% nationwide. enable gays to benefits, etc - BS. It's already been offered, ala Civ. Unions.
2 - The only way we could be "hurting" that little girl is if her 2 mommies or 2 daddies are determing how much THEY love her based upon how much they are accepted by society at large. If they love her, euqally and unconditionally, then their life circumstances will have no bearing on how or whether the little girl gets hurt. Again, nothing but emotional immaturity and intellectul dishonesty from your side.
I, at first, thought your post must be meant as satire....but I think you might be serious. Even though there is nothing even remotely resonant of cognitive thought in your post, I wanted to respond anyway. 1 - Your label of "bigot" is so tired it's actually irritating. It is nothing more than an emotional trigger meant to checkmate people with whom you disagree. The truth is the right to marriage is equally provided already, in the constitution. Meaning....there is no right to marry. It's a societal norm, determined by....well, society at large. There can be no label of bigot, for disagreeing on something that the majority of people do. It's called a Republic dude. Majority rules. Sorry, but that's life. Cont'd
So, B_S (wow, did you plan that?) I have to take umbrage with your contention that to disagree with the homosexual agenda means you are a homophobe. This blithering of the highest order and I am pretty sick of being told that I am AFRAID of something simply because I disagree with it. If you're going to come on here and preach (and you have, for the most part, done it well) then you should probably stay away from insulting the very people whom you are preaching to. Maybe try and understand what WE'RE saying and not just lasered in on your own voice. P.S. - I don't fear homosexuals, I simply don't want to be told what I should believe and what I shouldn't.
Don't tell my wife........but I think I love you! :-) That is dead on right. Sing it Jennifer!
In response to:

The Bible vs. Heart

Chicago Undercover Wrote: Apr 02, 2013 2:38 AM
Here's another great site: http://www.biblegateway.com I'll read your link front to back, every single solitary word.....if you'll do the same with my link. deal?
In response to:

The Bible vs. Heart

Chicago Undercover Wrote: Apr 02, 2013 2:37 AM
Adam Lanza's heart told him to kill 20 people in Newtown. James Holmes; Jared Loughner; Dylan Kliebold; John Wayne Gacy; every abortion ever committed; every death sentence carried out; female genital mutilation; stoning; the Russian pogroms; Pol Pot; the list goes on and on and on and on and on. ALL of these things were a result of someone' "heart" guiding them. Beyond your obvious disdain for anything related to the Bible, can you actually refute what Mr. Prager actually said above?
Previous 21 - 30 Next