In response to:

Liberals Find out Women Aren’t Amused

chicagobell Wrote: Oct 27, 2012 11:30 AM
Really? Because, as a woman, I find the opposite to be true. Here's some examples of why (even though you didn't provide any): 1) The demasculinizing of men have made it difficult for real women to find suitable mates 2) The welfare system has increased the number of single mothers and also added to the decline of the family unit 3) Free love and sex for all (and little values) has increased the STD rate (which hurts their lady parts) 4) The healthcare law is already causing hospitals to cut staff and freeze hiring (and, yes, most of my fellow nurses are women) 5) Mammograms are ALREADY being rationed under this administration. So, there's 5 examples. There's plenty more. Now, go search the Huffington Post for a rebuttal.
Wayne from the Hoosier state Wrote: Oct 27, 2012 12:29 PM
Change your word could to should. I don't think that can hear the coffee burning yet.
dflojak Wrote: Oct 27, 2012 11:49 AM
Well done, too bad the people that could learn something will ignore it or blame it on Bush.

Soon will come the finger-pointing.

Liberals will gnash their teeth, pull their hair and recriminate.

Yes; true, this is normal behavior on the part of liberals. But this time the behavior will be uproarious and hilarious.

Because this time, the folks who brought us Occupy Wall Street won’t be in a drum circle, but in a circular firing squad facing their comrades, their righteous fingers loaded and looking for blame.

“Oh, Chicago!” they’ll say. “Bang, bang.”  

Sure, there will be the typical liberal shots at the “racists” on the right who denied Obama a second term.

But...

Related Tags: Women