In response to:

Dem Rep. Says Obama Should “Exploit” Shooting to Get More Gun Control

CharlesE Wrote: Dec 15, 2012 12:40 PM
Yes! This is the critical point! Why aren't schools better defended? Why isn't someone else armed at the school to intercept the attacker effectively? It would be so much easier to arm and protect every school than it would to "stamp our evil" by early diagnoses and special programs to control the disturbed!
Jay Wye Wrote: Dec 15, 2012 1:51 PM
it would be FAR easier and LESS costly to allow school employees to be armed on school property. Pay them a small bonus for being armed on the job. that makes it TOO RISKY for any terrorist to try an attack on a school. They have no idea who is armed,while guards are visible and easily countered,the first to be shot.
In his weekly address to the nation, President Obama said that, “we have to come together and take meaningful action to prevent more tragedies like this. Regardless of the politics.” He said that, “we have endured far too many of these tragedies in the last few years,” and pointed to the massacre in Connecticut yesterday as the latest in a number of recent incidents. So what does he mean by ‘meaningful action’? More gun control, of course.   

Yesterday, a Democratic lawmaker was even more forthright:

Rep. Jerrold Nadler, who represents portions of New York City,...