1 - 10 Next
In response to:

The War on Men

Charles2040 Wrote: Mar 18, 2012 3:57 PM
Many have contorted this artical. Missing the point all together! I want a President that is fair with the people and will put those that are twisted in thinking of changing the constitution in their place and have no fear in shooting down any complaint otherwise.
In response to:

The War on Men

Charles2040 Wrote: Mar 18, 2012 3:51 PM
Now can you imagine if a dyke went to Japan? That's where they choose a son over a daughter.....if they want to chage the world...take a trip to Japan and give them an ear full of your women's rights propaganda.
In response to:

The War on Men

Charles2040 Wrote: Mar 18, 2012 3:46 PM
How about imposing a cap on the money able to spend on a campain???
In response to:

The War on Men

Charles2040 Wrote: Mar 18, 2012 3:44 PM
I can see your point to a point...when a person commits a crime he/she stands before the judge as an individual to answer for those crimes. Furthermore, "marching" I have meet so many people that are just as or more prejudice as whom they are claiming to be prejudice. Its all about putting someone on defense by accusations.
In response to:

IDs for Beer but Not for Ballots?

Charles2040 Wrote: Mar 18, 2012 3:25 PM
We could always pass a law that eric holder would be responsible for legit votes and if there are any illegal voting it cancels his position in the white house.
In response to:

IDs for Beer but Not for Ballots?

Charles2040 Wrote: Mar 18, 2012 3:19 PM
Holder would have a much larger animal on his hands to fight if we consolidated all the issues of ID showing for the many different reasons we have on the law books now, into one, as they do with a criminals charges to save the court time and money. Come on Holder fight the whole legal system while your at it. The fact of having to show your ID to vote is a reasonable law and needs to be implimented.
In response to:

IDs for Beer but Not for Ballots?

Charles2040 Wrote: Mar 18, 2012 3:14 PM
Just a small change in the wording would kill Holders chances of accomplishing what is in itself illegal to do about the ID showing episode here. First of all the showing of an ID is merely to verify they are 18 years of age to vote. Not to mention the facts on the issue, are they even alive and not faking a dead person (which is a known fact that has occured before). Lets just take the wording out that says to verify if the person is legal.
Ever think about why Michelle continues to claim americans are ignorant or just don't get it? Thats Black people code as a reminder during the slave days people used to think black people were ignorant. It's her sick and twisted humor to remind the Black community (in code) where they came from.
In response to:

Sarah Palin Slams Michelle Obama

Charles2040 Wrote: Mar 15, 2012 9:12 AM
Michelle just so happened to be interviewed by a Black woman?....that was no happen-stance situation. Michelle is very prejudice.
The best way for Obama to energize america, would be to step down from office.....:0)
1 - 10 Next