In response to:

Rupert Murdoch vs Mitt Romney

cgoodwin Wrote: Jul 10, 2012 12:41 AM
I still do not see anyone who can give any valid reasons why anyone running is superior to RON PAUL as president. How would it be to have a president who speaks the truth? How about one who would do away with the IRS and the Federal Reserve? How about a president who really supports, protects and defends the Constitution? How about a true patriot who is also a veteran of our military service?
Milt37 Wrote: Jul 10, 2012 2:07 PM
Yeah,

And I'd vote for George Washington or Abraham Lincoln if they were still alive. Ron Paul, is gone for this election.

Get over it little girlies, your grandpa ain't ever gonna be the President.
suzyqzy Wrote: Jul 10, 2012 9:16 AM
Does a "true patriot" think it's OK that Iran develop nuclear weapons?
annfan_777 Wrote: Jul 10, 2012 7:11 AM
He can't win. That's all the reason we need.

Fox News and Wall Street Journal mogul Rupert Murdoch has gone public with his dislike of Mitt Romney. Murdoch tweeted on July 1, “Met Romney last week. Tough O Chicago pros will be hard to beat unless he drops old friends from team and hires some real pros. Doubtful.” Murdoch is displeased that Romney has retained some of the same campaign advisers from his 2008 run for president. Last week, Murdoch tweeted about Romney, "Seems to play everything safe, make no news except burn off Hispanics."

When asked if he had contributed to Romney's campaign, Murdoch replied, “None!” Generally...

Related Tags: Mitt Romney Rupert Murdoch