In response to:

Why Do We Need High Capacity Magazines? To Stop the Bad Guys

CGinColo Wrote: Apr 17, 2013 5:28 PM
I disagree with your premise Katie. FIrst, we should not answer the question about "why do you need..?"Unless the answer is "none of your dam business" We have a right to firearms because the giverment is not granted the authority by the Consitution, to take them away. Second amendment or no second amendment. Let’s be clear. We have that right because we need it not to hunt, not to target practice, not to collect, ... but to defend ourselves from tyrants that will try to kill us as socialism reaches its more mature state. As nearly every other socialist tyrant has done throughout history. I have guns to kill those would attack me. Not just burglars. .
M.K. Wrote: Apr 17, 2013 6:03 PM
When I joined up, I took an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. I did not take an oath to defend the government.
BudWiser Wrote: Apr 17, 2013 5:39 PM
Reid admitting on the Floor of the Senate that it is "Anti-Gun Legislation"

* Editors note: TOWNHALL News Editor Katie Pavlich is participating in a multi-day firearms training course at the Gunsite Academy in Paulden, Arizona. Stay tuned for daily dispatches. This is the fifth dispatch. As the dispatches accumulate, they'll all be available here.

PAULDEN, Ariz. - Much of the recent gun control debate around the country has been centered around “high capacity magazines,” which begs the question, just how many rounds of ammunition should a law abiding citizen be legally capable of putting into their gun? The answer is, as many rounds as it takes to stop a violent...