In response to:

Correction: Abortion Lawsuit-NC story

CGinColo Wrote: Jan 18, 2014 10:14 PM
If any of your beliefs about republicans were true, you might have a case there. As for women being free to control their lives, we see no problem. When a woman wants to control another human life (by killing it), then we do have a problem. When a woman chooses to get pregnant, she waives her right to kill her dependent. Here is an analogy. If I choose to take on the caregiving of a totally helpless old relative, do I have the right to kill him or simply abandon him with no source of support, if he becomes inconvenient to me?

GREENSBORO, N.C. (AP) — In a story Jan. 17 about a court ruling on North Carolina's 2011 abortion law, The Associated Press reported erroneously in the headlines what the judge found unconstitutional. U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles invalidated requiring an abortion provider to describe to the patient what is displayed on an accompanying ultrasound. The story also erroneously described state Rep. Paul Stam, R-Wake, as the House majority leader.

A corrected version of the story is below:

Judge: NC abortion provider speech mandate illegal

US judge rules NC law requiring doctors' speech with ultrasound before abortion is invalid


Associated Press