In response to:

NBC’s David Gregory Breaks Gun Laws "For the Greater Good"

Cepat2 Wrote: Dec 27, 2012 8:41 AM
What "investigation" is required? The jerk openly possessed a magazine (loaded/unloaded irrelevant) in D.C. and that is a crime punishable under existing law? Sustern is correct to decry the need for useless effort by the authorities. Dammit we have pictures which were broadcast on national television. "Investigation" is code for dithering and then cowardice. What utter dreck.
traitorbill Wrote: Dec 27, 2012 9:00 AM
"Investigation" is a way of putting something off until it is forgotten. Kind of like when outraged diplomats take a matter to the U.N. When you got no ballls, option 1 is to kick the can down the road.
rhinegarten Wrote: Dec 27, 2012 8:46 AM
Investigation=dithering until the whole thing blows over
TX Yankee Wrote: Dec 27, 2012 8:46 AM
Ah, but in liberal la-la land, Mr. Gregory is to be "presumed innocent."
traitorbill Wrote: Dec 27, 2012 9:01 AM
A picture isn't worth a thousand words until some liberal explains what it means.

By now you've seen the stories about NBC anchor David Gregory breaking Washington D.C. gun laws by brandishing a 30-round magazine during his abrasive interview with NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre last Sunday. From the anchor chair, Gregory pretty much said high capacity magazines should be banned. Now, because the possession of 30-round magazines are illegal in the District of Columbia, Gregory is under investigation by police; as he should be. Not only did he violate D.C. gun laws, but according to D.C. police [who have confirmed multiple times], he knowingly violated the law after being denied...