In response to:

Ruth Bader Ginsburg and a Question of Eugenics

CeeDee Wrote: Jul 16, 2009 5:15 PM
It's interesting that after about 50 million legal abortions since 1973, the "improvements" in society, that a eugenicist should expect, are just not there.

Sometimes I think that it would more fitting if the last lines of the National Anthem were, "...the land of the deceived and the home of the depraved."

MizDee

Here's what Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in Sunday's New York Times Magazine: "Frankly I had thought that at the time (Roe v. Wade) was decided," Ginsburg told her interviewer, Emily Bazelon, "there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of."

The comment, which bizarrely elicited no follow-up from Bazelon or any further coverage from the New York Times -- or any other major news outlet -- was in the context of Medicaid funding for abortion. Ginsburg was surprised when the Supreme Court in 1980 barred...