In response to:

The Republican Rape Dilemma

Caveat emptor Wrote: Oct 26, 2012 1:03 PM
Christians should put their enery into developing ways to provide non lethal abortion and adoption services. Stop trying to criminalize the excersize of Pregnent womens property rights and start trying ti limit the damage of lawful abortion.
restoreliberty Wrote: Oct 26, 2012 2:20 PM
please explain to all of us what a non-lethal abortion is.....curious minds want to know

so babies are slaves and fall under the laws of property

great moral relativism you have going on there
restoreliberty Wrote: Oct 26, 2012 1:23 PM
non-lethal abortion??? please tell us all what that would be

property rights??? so a baby is a slave and if the woman chooses to kill the slave that is her right under the laws of property????

really handy moral relativism you have working there
Jack2894 Wrote: Oct 26, 2012 1:47 PM
Its a zygote. ANd yes, it is the property of the woman.
Ken6226 Wrote: Oct 26, 2012 1:53 PM
Once again, Jack displays his monumental ignorance.
Jack2894 Wrote: Oct 26, 2012 2:05 PM
Once again Ken babbles without providing any informaiton.

As Richard Mourdock’s Indiana Senate fate hinges on how voters absorb his views on rape, all conservatives have an opportunity for a look in the mirror.

Just how pro-life do we want to be?

The Mourdock controversy is nothing like Todd Akin’s self-inflicted wound in Missouri, the result of an embrace of just plain bad medical information.

Mourdock is in hot water for accurately (if not particularly skillfully) articulating what God instructs about the life of the unborn.

If he is on politically shaky ground, it is because he had the courage to stand on the...

Tuesday, May 21 | 06:06 PM ET
Tuesday, May 21 | 06:06 PM ET
Tuesday, May 21 | 06:06 PM ET
Tuesday, May 21 | 06:06 PM ET