In response to:

Mother of Boston Bombers to CNN: Allahu Akbar!

Caveat emptor Wrote: Apr 25, 2013 5:29 PM
Morality isn't about injunctions, it's about what is optimal. It's moral to not kill. Nature doesn't make absolute injunctions, what nature does is provide suboptimal outcomes including illness, death and extinction.
DevinDenver Wrote: Apr 25, 2013 6:03 PM
CE, you crack me up. You make these claims and absolutisms and when called on them revert to some squishy, this is "what should happen". But, friend, we here do not all have ADD. YOU specifically said that MORALS were laws of nature much like physics (remember?). Well, in physics, the LAWS are immutable and there is no "this is what should happen". Either it follows the LAWS of NATURE or it doesn't. Morality can therefore not be a law of nature if the the laws or only guidelines that individuals can choose to follow or not. And THAT brings us full circle to my original post to you. Moral are not just abstractions, they came about as society formed and, much to your disliking, were primarily formed as the result of religious followings

The mother of Boston bombing suspects Tamerlan and Tzhokhar Tsarnaevso, told CNN Wednesday night she doesn't care about one of her sons being killed in a shootout with police or whether her youngest son is killed in the future. Instead, she wants the world to hear her say, "Allahu Akbar!" From Gateway Pundit:

“If they are going to kill him. I don’t care. My oldest son is killed, so I don’t care. I don’t care if my youngest son is going to be killed today. I want the world to hear this. And, I don’t care if...