In response to:

The Invincible Lie

Catherine20 Wrote: Jul 12, 2012 6:43 PM
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting an inexperienced man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama Presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their President. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America . Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their President." http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/04/will_i
Ann272 Wrote: Jul 12, 2012 7:42 PM
superb summation. Thank you for posting this. November 2012 will be the major election of this nation.
Charles3662 Wrote: Jul 12, 2012 7:06 PM
And Catherine20, what was the primary goal of the citizenry that elected Barack Obama? Was it a group which thought, "How nice to elect a black man and give him a chance." They might as well have chosen a golden idol or a snake if it satisfied their immediate desire. It is not Barack Obama I resent so much as those who believe he is and will continue to be a good president. Those people are not fools, nobody fooled them, they just don't care what happens.
Anyone who wants to study the tricks of propaganda rhetoric has a rich source of examples in the statements of President Barack Obama. On Monday, July 9th, for example, he said that Republicans "believe that prosperity comes from the top down, so that if we spend trillions more on tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, that that will somehow unleash jobs and economic growth."

Let us begin with the word "spend." Is the government "spending" money on people whenever it does not tax them as much as it can? Such convoluted reasoning would never pass muster if the mainstream media were not...