The case against pornography appears to be based only on emotion. Women don't want their man looking at naked women because it makes them feel inadequate. Religious men try to resist pornography, often cannot, and so they feel very, very guilt.
Is there damage to society? All the stats show that crimes of a sexual nature are on a low term downtrend. And damage to marriage? I could just as easily argue that the problem is women being overly sensitive to their man watching moderate amounts of porn. This, after all, is instinctual behavior for men.
What do you suppose are the chances that the Secret Service agents who embarrassed themselves, possibly endangered the life of the president of the United States, and very likely damaged their marriages and the lives of their children by engaging prostitutes in Cartagena, were consumers of pornography?
I'd guess 100 percent. Not that watching porn completely accounts for the behavior. But pornography undermines sexual restraint. It offers a distorted image of what "everybody" is doing, and it grants permission for indulging every conceivable urge. Porn is mainstream now, offered in nearly every hotel room and ubiquitous on the Internet. The stigma that...
cashe Wrote: 50 minutes ago (1:23 AM)
" ... Is there damage to society? All the stats show that crimes of a sexual nature are on a low term downtrend. And damage to marriage? I could just as easily argue that the problem is women being overly sensitive to their man watching moderate amounts of porn. This, after all, is instinctual behavior for men. "
~~~
You are, after all, an ignorant and stupid fool.
Sadly, while Ignorance can be cured, Stupidity cannot.
I think you have been active enough for tonight. Why don't you give it a rest? You surely have exceeded your quota for stupidity.