In response to:

IBD: Kerry Duped as North Korea and Iran develop new ICBM

cashe Wrote: Dec 03, 2013 8:58 AM
Most historians agree that the agreement between Mr Chamberlain and Hitler benefited the Brits as it gave them sufficient time to complete their arms buildup. I am guessing that no agreement between Obama and Iran would have been acceptable to conservatives. Apparently, war is the only answer. I suggest every republican run in 2014 on the "Let's go to war with Iran" slogan. You will all find out that Americans do not want to go to war with Iran.
LonePine Wrote: Dec 03, 2013 2:53 PM
Yeah ! Evil, wicked, bad & nasty conservatives. After all, everybody knows that , errrr, that, ummmmm, . . .didn't all that eventually END in a bit of a Tiff, after all ? What was it called again ? World War II ? How did the U.S. get involved again ? The Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, wasn't it ? And what ended it all, finally ? The first use of nuclear weapons, wasn't it ? Yeah. Those . . .darn war-mongering conservatives, pushing aggressiveness away until, until, errrr, no, it was the liberals that did THAT, wasn't it ? Look Libs. Like it or not. Peace is the result of others being afraid of attacking you. Maybe it ain't pretty, but its true.
Bondman60 Wrote: Dec 04, 2013 1:37 PM
+1 LonePine. Besides, you'd think the leftists would like wars, since most of our voluntary army is made up of conservatives from the fly-over regions. It's a straw-man cashe sets up anyway: All conservatives want is to leave a credible THREAT of military action on the table, as a backstop to a peaceful resolution. But this deal is anything but a resolution. As Churchill said to Chamberlain: "You have chosen appeasement over war. And you shall have both." Why does our nation have to wait to be attacked in order to deal with a threat? Why do we have see a major U.S. city become a radioactive pile of rubble, with hundreds of thousands dead, or an EMP attack that will lead to mass starvation and disease, when we could stop it from happening in the first place?
Roy-WV Wrote: Dec 04, 2013 8:53 PM
"MAAD" has, in fact WORKED, eh, what?
Englishlass Wrote: Dec 03, 2013 1:02 PM
NO, the Brits weren't building up despite Churchill's warnings.
Chamberlain was as STUPID as is Kerry, Obama and Shillary.
Paul237 Wrote: Dec 03, 2013 10:34 AM
And if you look at whats going on over there right now that is just where we are now headed, iran has been enriching uranium to a level that is way above that needed for any type of reactor, the only purpose to push for 50%+ is for a weapons system. Right now they are heading up to the 70% mark and yet iran says it is for reactor fuel, at the most reactors use no more than 10%, that higher point is for only one thing and that is nuclear weapons.