1 - 10 Next
I tried 4 different ways to READ your blog, but
unsuccessful in each attempt.
Oh well, my comment would be the same:

I've read MUCH on Soros, and have never seen
him NOT put his money where his mouth was. I'd
find it unusual if he didn't invest some $$$$
in a boycott, too.
In response to:

Encouraging!

carolyn351 Wrote: Oct 16, 2009 7:38 PM
The Rasmussan Poll, May 2009, showed Liberals 21%
Moderates 35%, Conservatives 40%.
With the growth of those desiring to keep our
Consitution and Bill of Rights, such as: Tea
Party, CanYouHearMeNow,the Townhall meetings (causing some to NOT have one), "9-12," "MOMS" in almost every state, plus the FRC, AFA, ADF, ACLJ, and many more, there is a unity growing between the Moderates and Conseratives. I would like to see a more recent Rasmussan Poll on that, but just watching the rate of approval for BO, Reid, and Pelosi sliding down the slippery slope of Socialism should be sufficient to affirm that the Liberals are being diminished in numbers.
Even with ACORN's history of "voter-registration" (lol), the possibility of...
In response to:

Encouraging!

carolyn351 Wrote: Oct 16, 2009 7:38 PM
The Rasmussan Poll, May 2009, showed Liberals 21%
Moderates 35%, Conservatives 40%.
With the growth of those desiring to keep our
Consitution and Bill of Rights, such as: Tea
Party, CanYouHearMeNow,the Townhall meetings (causing some to NOT have one), "9-12," "MOMS" in almost every state, plus the FRC, AFA, ADF, ACLJ, and many more, there is a unity growing between the Moderates and Conseratives. I would like to see a more recent Rasmussan Poll on that, but just watching the rate of approval for BO, Reid, and Pelosi sliding down the slippery slope of Socialism should be sufficient to affirm that the Liberals are being diminished in numbers.
Even with ACORN's history of "voter-registration" (lol), the possibility of...
The last sentence: "It doesn't have to take an
act of Congress." I take that to mean that it
CAN TAKE AN ACT OF CONGRESS, and that is exactly what is horrid about THIS CONGRESS.
Sooooo. They might have to through 12 appropriation bills. That means that there are
12 different what? Homeland Security? HHS? CIA?
FBI? DoD? Ethics? Commerce? Ways and Means? VA?
Martha Stewart's Cookie sheet Committee/bill?
STUPIDITY GONE TO SEED!
THIS Administration isn't solely guilty. I guess a lot of this 'sleight of hand' goes on and
on for the past 'few' Administrations. THAT DOES
NOT MAKE IT RIGHT. THAT DOES NOT MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO START SOMEWHERE TO STRAIGHTEN THE
D.C. MESS OUT. WHY NOT START HERE, WITH...
In response to:

Obama Lied, His Credibility Died

carolyn351 Wrote: Sep 14, 2009 11:21 PM
My opinion. Rep Heller offered an Amendment, in Committee, to put Congress under Obama's H-C
Plan. It was UNANIMOUSLY defeated by the Dems.
It has never seen the light of day since.
Doesn't THAT tell you THOSE DEMS. THINK BO IS
LYING, TOO?
The Congress is under the Federal Employees
health/medical plan. It is superior, by far, to BO's H-C. WHY ELSE STICK WITH THE PLAN THEY
ALREADY HAVE? It's better, that's why!
If they BELIEVED HIM, why veto an Amendment to PUT CONGRESS UNDER BO'S PLAN??
That tells me that BO's plan is good enough
for YOU, ME, OUR PARENTS, GRANDPARENTS, ETC
BUT;IT ISN'T GOOD ENOUGH FOR THEM! They like
and want to keep the superior plan they have.
IT ALSO TELLS ME THAT...
My opinion: How many are now sitting in Congress because of ACORN voter-registration
fraud? We'll never know.
ACORN MUST BE INVESTIGATED BY AN
INDEPENDENT, OUT OF THE LOOP TEAM. How it can
be done, I sure don't know. I don't think it
could be investigated, without bias, by any bureau or department IN D.C. And certainly
by no CZAR.
My opinions: I suggest you go back to first post, Retired Geek, and re-read it. It is
accurate. Obama and ACORN seem to be "smack dab in the middle" of things costing the U.S.
tax-payers: that's US, people!
$8.5 billion is what ACORN got from BO's
stimulus scam. Quite a "thank you."
How much has America lost due to ACORN? How
much of OUR taxes have cleaned up the mess of ACORN's 'help' in home purchases to uneligible buyers; voter-registration fraud, which likely might have given us a majority of Democrats in the House and/or Senate; the (P)Residency of the WH? Who will ever know how deep the tentacles of ACORN has been embedded in this history-changing regime?
What America has lost is more than 'just'...
In my comments, speaking of the stimulus bill,
I used Trillions, not Billions. My error, I
apologize. LOL I guess I hear "trillion" so
often from DC anymore, that I've become used to
it. Trillion no longer shocks me, but I DID
make the error and own up to it...Mea cupla.
+My Opinion. I should have taped his speech (lol I RARELY listen to him..I see his lips moving and that's enough) However, as I recollect (and I DO have a short-term memory deficit) I believe he said that could "squeeze" (or at least realize a savings from) the fraud, waste, and abuse of our current med/ins situation.
If he REALLY believes he could save BILLIONS
(8?), which would subtract from the amount it
will REALLY cost to implement his scheme, then
why couldn't he have done the same thing with
the Stimulus package? Hmmm?
Had he "squeezed" that, he should have gotten enough PORK lard to pay a few weeks of our $500
billion a day INTEREST ONLY on our nat'l debt.
I don't think anyone believes that...
In response to:

ACORN Exposed: Stealing Democracy

carolyn351 Wrote: Sep 10, 2009 3:07 PM
My opinion only: BO said he'd "squeeze the
fraud, waste, & abuse...." (from the hellthcare plan,) but ACORN IS THE PLACE TO START PROVING
PROVING PROVING that waste, fraud, & abuse
CAN BE SQUEEZED, by squeezing an operation
which has already shown fraud, waste, and abuse, including conviction/sentencing of some of their people! If HE can accomplish THAT with ACORN, I might actually believe he could do it with an untried operation of his "hellth-care plan! BUT NOT UNTIL THEN.
He surely didn't "squeeze" the waste, fraud, and abuse of HIS BAIL OUT! If he had squeezed
it, he would have gotten plenty of lard from that PORK. Only thing that got "squeezed" was the tax-payers wallets.
Voter-registration...
1 - 10 Next
Monday, June 04 | 11:35 PM ET
Monday, June 04 | 11:35 PM ET
Monday, June 04 | 11:35 PM ET
Monday, June 04 | 11:35 PM ET