If the Nutters do not get to change it, the First Amendment allows us to say more than Canadians.

Don't have a cow or a cornea now, Nutter, but, boy, are you aptly named.Did you go to bat for the AK-47 black panther uniformed poll watchers in your burg? Do you ever get spoken down to for your idea that Affirnative Action means keeping white folks under the jackboot? Which part for the foregoing, in your Nutter view, is not protected by The First Amendment?

Seems clear that the happy couple commited no crime, as they had no knowledge of their relationship and thus did not lie on marriage application. That said, the marriage is defective and can be annulled. The birth defect risk which is the basis for the no incestuous standard is irrelevant as the three kids either dodged the bullet or not. There might be a crime if a fourth child is born. Thre might be a crime if sexual relations continue even absent a new pregnancy. I hope gay partners rethink this whole type of deal.

Let's face it, Bill toggles wildly back and forth from semi automatic to automatic. He will come around. Have Ann explain it to him. We love ya, Bill.