Why wouldn't she be qualified? She's smart, savvy, thoughtful, insightful, and willing to fight for what she believes. Compared to O, her qualifications are extensive. She certainly doesn't lead from behind; she wouldn't be wavering in support of Israel as O is; she wouldn't be preparing to give into Russia's demands that we downgrade our defenses. What is wrong with you? Is it because she's a woman?

And you base that comment on what? Her correctly identifying death panels in OCare? Her calls for "Drill, Baby, Drill" when people, like me, are paying over $4 per gallon of gas in CT? Her criticism of O's policies which are driving us down the road to a Greece-like economy? What are your examples?

You're right, Anne. She is the one Republican voice to whom I always listen because she makes sense, doesn't pull any punches, and scares the heck out of the Republican establishment and the Democrats. If she didn't, just mentioning her name wouldn't result in such crazy responses. And she doesn't get nasty about it, just smiles and continues to blast the idiots. I love her!

You do realize, don't you, that it was Obama who did that?

I agree wholeheartedly. Voting is a privilege, and those who don't appreciate that right to vote and are unwilling to make the effort should stay home

I agree to a point. O'Reilly has lost my interest as he does seem to have more libs than conservatives. However, I watch Brett Baier (sp?) in the evening, and I learn a lot from the panel he has on. Charles Krauthammer and a number of the others who appear are conservative and willing to argue with Juan Williams and other libs. Although Chris Wallace is obviously a lib, his panels are usually pretty well-balanced and provide good back and forth arguments. Megyn Kelly (sp?) is terrific, too. Overall, I think compared to the other news programs Fox is fair and balanced.

Sorry for the multiple, duplicate posts. My computer doesn't seem to be up to speed today.

Getting a photo ID is not a difficult thing to accomplish. If that's such a hardship for the poor, the elderly, and minorities, why not simply come up with myriad ways for IDs to be obtained instead of making it easier for those of questionable ethics to be able to infiltrate election security. Duh!

Getting a photo ID is not a difficult thing to accomplish. If that's such a hardship for the poor, the elderly, and minorities, why not simply come up with myriad ways for IDs to be obtained instead of making it easier for those of questionable ethics to be able to infiltrate election security. Duh!

Getting a photo ID is not a difficult thing to accomplish. If that's such a hardship for the poor, the elderly, and minorities, why not simply come up with myriad ways for IDs to be obtained instead of making it easier for those of questionable ethics to be able to infiltrate election security. Duh!