Previous -2 - 4
Cities are shitholes because they are populated largely by people who gravitate towards the collective ... sheeple who have no sense of independence or self-reliance live there in hopes that those motivated by their lust for power over others will grace them with a few crumbs and "protection" from the savages amongst them, in exchange for their obedience and servitude.
In response to:

The Israeli Solution

CarlStevenson Wrote: Feb 26, 2014 12:48 PM
Israel should give NOTHING to the Arab terrorists. What the should do is take back Gaza and get rid of the terrorists there. The constant capitulation to terrorists just encourages them to push for more, and their goal is the destruction of Israel. If the Obama regime doesn't like it, Israel should tell Obama what he can kiss.
This is what happens when collectivists gain power over disarmed populations. about 262 MILLION people were murdered BY THEIR OWN GOVERNMENTS in the 20th century – AFTER they allowed those governments to disarm them. See: http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/20TH.HTM They ALL thought “It can’t happen here” – until they were disarmed and it started, then it was too late. Don’t make the same mistake. Don’t EVER let your government disarm you. Don’t tell me, “It can’t happen here in America.” To borrow a quote from Mike Vanderboegh, “Anyone who tells you that ‘It Can’t Happen Here’ is whistling past the graveyard of history. There is no ‘house rule’ that bars tyranny coming to America. History is replete with republics whose people grew complacent and descended into imperial butchery and chaos.”
The "war on poverty" was designed exactly to perpetuate, and even grow, poverty to create a dependent class. LBJ said, "We'll have those &!ggers voting democrat for the next hundred years."
Many states have. Here in PA, our castle doctrine law immunizes one against civil damages suits for use of justified force in self-defense, not just at home, but anywhere one has a legal right to be.
Of course it's politicizing. The opponents of the right to self-defense use EVERY incident to try to push their political agenda - disarming all Americans, so they can better rule/control us with their tyranny. NOTHING they proposed would have done a damned thing to stop Sandy Hook, or Aurora, or VA tech! or Columnbine. Of the 62 or so mass shootings in the past 4 decades, all but ONE (Gabby Giffords) was in a "gun free" zone where all potential victims were disarmed for the convenience of the murderer. Legal use of guns in self defense saves at least 65 times more lives each year than criminal misuse of guns takes. If you're a total pacifist and believe, like the gun grabbers, that a woman who allows herself to be raps, tortured, and murdered (rather than shoot her would be rapist) is somehow morally superior, feel free to be a sheep led to the slaughter, but don't presume to tell the rest of us we have to be equally stupid to make you feel better. There was far less crime when firearms ownership, and carrying a gun openly, was commonplace and didn’t cause a stir of indignation from a bunch of wusses who are too afraid of their own shadow to even contemplate taking responsibility for their own safety and the safety of their families and communities. The government loves that “the government will protect me” attitude … It’s the source of tremendous power for the politicians and their agents. Look at the militarization of our police departments and the growth of the new Gestapo known as DHS. Look at the FBI and BATF’s assassination of Randy Weaver’s wife and son at Ruby Ridge and their assassination of about 80 innocent men, women and children at Waco … Study those events and you will see that they were murderd by government agents who not only walked free with no punishment, but were actually commended and promoted as a reward when the dust settled after the cover ups. We don’t need more Gestapo, we need for people to get over their irrational fear of weapons of self-defense (a fear that is being indoctrinated into our children in those government indoctrination centers known as public schools … research that on the Internet too).
In response to:

Guns In Bars

CarlStevenson Wrote: Nov 25, 2013 9:17 AM
I live in PA. there is no legal prohibition on carrying in places that serve alcohol. There also isn't a problem. Just because I have a beer doesn't mean I small any more likely to wrongfully shoot someone. It also shouldn't mean I am less entitled to defend myself. I will not patronize any establishment that would deny me my rights.
Previous -2 - 4