In response to:

WH Official: Holder's Letter to Rand Paul was an Intentional Non-Answer

Carlos7 Wrote: Mar 11, 2013 7:50 PM
Remember ... About 90% of Elected/Party Republicans hate Rand Paul. Most are not sure why, other than he occasionally tells the truth, and that give them heartburn. The Truth, by the way, is Jesus Christ ... the most hated of all — 2,000 years and running.
jnovak692 Wrote: Mar 11, 2013 8:30 PM
Heartburn??? more like cardiac arrest, if one thinks mclame and his sidekick howdy doody!! had anything meaningful to say!!
McGovern Wrote: Mar 11, 2013 7:54 PM
The old guard Republicans in Washington are worried someone may actually challenge them in a primary.

Let's never forget that over the past 20 years, Republicans have controlled Congress for most of those years. Yet we have very few conservative principles instituted.

It's time Conservatives take back the Republican Party.
Carlos7 Wrote: Mar 11, 2013 7:58 PM

But it all rests with the American people. A rather frightening thought some days :-)
BudWiser Wrote: Mar 11, 2013 7:59 PM
They watched Richard Lugar lse his lifetime seat.

We may not have won the seat because of Mourdock got Macaca'd, but the Democrat that beat him isn't that far to the Left of Lugar

Here's Kevin explaining why Eric Holder's curt reply to Rand Paul's question on domestic drones is "slippery," at best:

Sen. Paul's communications team declared victory after Eric Holder sent a letter to Paul today saying that no, President Obama does not claim "the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil." ... While it sounds nice that if an American isn't "engaged in combat," she'll be safe, that still leaves the Obama Administration a lot of wiggle room. And precious little oversight.