In response to:

Why Did America’s Economy Boom When Reagan and Clinton Reduced the Burden of Spending?

Carl265 Wrote: Mar 11, 2013 12:47 AM
Until the low information voters are affected nothing will change. When John Q realizes the income in Washington and surrounding counties is almost double the mean average in the working world, maybe they will wake up.

Triggered by an appearance on Canadian TV, I asked yesterday why we should believe anti-sequester Keynesians. They want us to think that a very modest reduction in the growth of government spending will hurt the economy, yet Canada enjoyed rapid growth in the mid-1990s during a period of substantial budget restraint.

I make a similar point in this debate with Robert Reich, noting that  the burden of government spending was reduced as a share of economic output during the relatively prosperous Reagan years and Clinton years.