1 - 10 Next
Now go ask that to people who don't have it.
This situation is bad. I won't deny that. But, would things be any _better_ with the Democrats in control? I think not. Would they be worse? Almost certainly.
This situation is bad. I won't deny that. But, would things be any _better_ with the Democrats in control? I think not. Would they be worse? Almost certainly.
To what end do you nuke the filibuster? There is ZERO chance Obama would sign the bill and then you'd need 67 votes to get the veto overridden. And unless you are planning on amending the Constiitution, there is no way around that. So you'd be right back where we are now. So I ask again...to what end do you nuke the filibuster?
While the Democrat's run the country into the ground. Don't forget that. You can't destroy the Republicans without simultaneously increasing the Democrat's power.
Woz, you do acknowledge that National Defense is one of the things the Constitution does empower the Federal Government to do, right?
"That's politics Mr. Barone. Which is something I don't want any part of, not do I care about" If you want to win an election, you'd better care about politics. That;'s just the way the world is. Deal with it.
Not vaccinating a child can lead to his/her death. But the point is...you ARE for government intervention - for "usurping God-given parental authority" - when you have decided (rightly, by the way) that the action (abortion) justifies overriding the parent's wishes.
So you are saying the primary elections do not exist or are you saying that no one votes in them?
So you are saying the primary elections do not exist or are you saying that no one votes in them?
1 - 10 Next