1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Let’s Exploit Liberal Hypocrisy

Cappmann Wrote: May 20, 2013 10:41 AM
Very well written post! One point not hammered here is to NOT let the dems dictate the discussion, which they will invariably attempt (indeed, they've already made several lame tries already). We need to hammer, and keep hammering on their hypocrisy. Point out, at every opportunity, their "firm" belief on outing political scandals - until the scandal is democrat and not republican. And the catch-phrase whenever a lib dem or reporter cries foul is that the issues ARE ALREADY political, so conservatives CAN'T be "politicizing" them.
This guy is using the same playbook Shrillary penned, Obama has used repeatedly, and Holder used the other day with his jab at Issa. Feigned offense at something "implied". No, the question was clear. And the act of targeting is just as clear.
Your objection to the term "targeting" is noted. Now answer the fuggin question.
The fuggin MORON can't even say "asterisk". What a pee-in-his-pants, liberal, hanky-stomping, panty-bunching IDIOT. He needs to just stroke-out and get it over with. He's not even amusing anymore...
You may have just nailed it Chris. Like the democrat party, who now totally ignores it's base and does whatever it decides to do, the "establishment" republican party is ignoring IT'S base - conservatives. The TEA Party IS the republican base, and had to form in order to counter the RINO republicans running the party. It is established fact that in any balanced election (where there is a relatively even right/left slpit), conservatives ALWAYS win. Romney was spot-on when he said he was ignoring the 40+% who would never even consider voting republican. They never will, no matter what. But this country has more center and center-right than far left, so going truely conservative will clean up. The repub party refuses to grasp that.
"I don't know that." "I was not aware of that." "I have no knowldege of that." "I was not involved in that." Well Eric, WHAT THE HELL DO YOU DO THEN? We're paying you almost $200,000 a year, and you seem to know ABSOLUTELY nothing about YOUR department. You knew nothing about Fast & Furious, intimidation, wiretapping, illegal surveillance, and now unwarranted access to phone records. If you're not lying through your teeth (which I SERIOUSLY doubt), you're the most incompetant AG we've ever had.
In response to:

Lies About Libya

Cappmann Wrote: May 14, 2013 10:47 AM
Agreed. Been saying that for years.
In response to:

Lies About Libya

Cappmann Wrote: May 14, 2013 10:44 AM
Isn't it amazing what you hear about when the media FINALLY DOES THEIR JOBS? Obama would not have been elected the first time, let alone re-elected, if the media had actually done what they're supposed to...
Not even factoring in the impeachable offenses, abuse of power, and corruption, this "We didn't know" answer to virtually everything negative is grounds for a no-confidence vote releiving the presidency and attorney general posts. For a start...
Oh, trust me, I give them no credit at all. I was just saying what THEY were thinking. Personally, I'm getting extremely tired of them insulting the intelligence of the half of the country that didn't vote for them...
1 - 10 Next
Thursday, May 23 | 09:10 PM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 09:10 PM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 09:10 PM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 09:10 PM ET