1 - 3
Good Lord! Another sophomore! What's the story? Let out of Marxist 101 class early?
Jaxxie, correct me if I'm wrong, but is there any chance that you're simply incapable of conducting a "balanced' discussion? Is there any corner of your sophomoric mind that is able to simply address an issue without emoting all over the page in fury? So far all you've done is call names, and squall shamelessly. Boring, old thing - terribly boring. But - on a par with Gregory. You can be proud of that.
The amusingly predictable aspect of your "simplistic superficial" remarks, Jaxxie, is that they have NO CONTENT. They're just the usual resentful, angry sophomore dismissal of a view you find threatening, completely ignoring the reasonable suggestion (or it WAS a reasonable suggestion when media people were professionals) that an interview with a president who is as controversial as he is, should be at least balanced, if not challenging. The problem with you "liberals" is that you don't appear to understand the concept of "balance". Anymore than you appear to recognize an 'in-your-face' lie. Hell. you people just emote on anything that challenges your reality, producing the same squall of fury that is produced by a baby losing the nipple.
1 - 3