In response to:

Both Parties Agree: Sequestration Is Bad, but Better Than The Alternatives

cancze Wrote: Feb 24, 2013 3:34 PM
Yea genius, people will hate him if the economy improves.
Dregs_are_Commies Wrote: Feb 24, 2013 3:41 PM
You're a dumb one alright, do you have a hussein phone?
Dave M Wrote: Feb 24, 2013 3:38 PM
Yea-Einstein. Did you even read his comment? His point was not whether people hate him or not but that his power is dependent on people being dependent on him. A good economy leads to the exact opposite.
Sequestration Is the Worst Option Except for All the Other Options Both Democrats and Republicans have been roundly criticizing the security and economic effects of sequestration and, at the same time, taking very little action. The only logical conclusion is that both parties agree that sequestration is an awful, terrible, harmful set of policies - except the other proposed replacements are worse.

President Obama said "these cuts are not smart. They are not fair. They will hurt our economy." Speaker Boehner, writing in the Wall Street Journal, said "there's nothing wrong with cutting spending that much......

Related Tags: Barack Obama Sequestration