In response to:

The Case Against “Equality”

Cambermeister Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 10:14 AM
David3036, you stated: "for legal purposes it doesn't matter what you call your own relationship or what your church calls it...whatever you call it should not have anything to do with what the state calls it or what it says on the license"
Cambermeister Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 10:16 AM
David3036, you said; “Wouldn't it be a whole lot easier to abandon this silly, semantic argument over a single word”

I'll have to pull rank on you. Your homosexual 'son' verifies you are 100% wrong on all of this.
Cambermeister Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 10:14 AM
"Elton is not hung up on the semantics as you and others are” “He recognizes that the important issue is the rights, not the word "marriage"" David3036

Pascal said, “People almost invariably arrive at their beliefs not on the basis of proof but on the basis of what they find attractive.” So-called marriage “equality” is attractive. Who could be against equality?

But what if the word “equality” is being misused? What if that kind of equality will have the unintended consequence of hurting children, individuals and the nation? And what if everyone already has true equality?

True equality does not conflate people and behavior. People are equal but their behaviors are not. When liberals claim that certain sexual behaviors are equal – or that all outcomes...