In response to:

Scouts Flirt with Dishonor and Destruction

Cambermeister Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 5:21 PM
API --- NEWS FLASH --- “...due to the decision delay by the Boy Scouts of America, homosexuals have taken their cue from the Girl Scouts of America and started their own organization called the Gay Scouts of America. Additionally, a variety of parents are getting together to start a scouting organization without the discriminatory attitude of the Boy Scouts”
Cambermeister Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 5:23 PM

“correction, there will be no Gay Scouts of America. Homosexual groups report their intentions weren’t to be a part of Scouting. They knew parents wouldn't let their Cub Scout go camping with homosexual men. They didn't really want into Scouting, they wanted to destroy Scouting and will continue working towards that end”
David3036 Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 5:56 PM
Isn't it incredible how you always know everyone's motivations? Is it kind of like marriage -- that gays want to "destroy" it by becoming a part of it? Where would that leave them?

Your twisted logic never ceases to amaze.
Cambermeister Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 6:19 PM
Grow up David3036. If the straights had chosen another term...would you still covet 'marriage'?
man of steel Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 7:58 PM
Yes, Cambermeister, you are correct. There is no way that parents would let their sons go camping while being led by a group of homosexuals, any more than they would allow their daughters to camp with straight men. Does anyone really believe gays want to be Boy Scouts that badly?

This will be the end of the Scouting program as we know it, which is the original plan from the Left. And 3036 - I don't think the motivation here is too hard to figure out. Not everyone is as stupid as you would like them to be.
Cambermeister Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 8:13 PM
Man Of Steel, it's always abot access to the children of others. David3036 wants public schools to introduce homosexuality to little kids.
Funny...I've never once wanted to reach a kid something his parents opposed.
David3036 Wrote: Feb 07, 2013 4:53 AM
And you want to "protect" children by keeping them ignorant of the real world. Just pretend that all love stories are like Cinderalla and the handsome prince, and they'll be little morally straight automatons.

Does the Cinderella story require teaching about sex?” Absurd, you would say. Just as absurd is the belief that explaining about boys loving boys and girls loving girls requires a sexually oriented discussion. It doesn't.

If the Cinderella story were about the prince and the chimney sweep, I promise you the lesson would not be traumatic or harmful to your child. Age-appropriate lessons about real human relationships should come as naturally as teaching children to tie their shoes.

Boy Scouts learn to start fires by rubbing two sticks together. Now, the national Scout leadership is playing with fire. Scratch that; they’re playing with explosives.

Under consideration for a vote during a Feb. 4th to 6th board of directors meeting is a rules change that would overturn the Scouts’ ban on openly homosexual members and leaders.

A press release on Jan. 28 by Scouts spokesman Deron Smith said, “This would mean there would no longer be any national policy regarding sexual orientation, but that the chartered organizations that oversee and deliver Scouting would accept membership and select leaders consistent with...