In response to:

Baltimore Sun in Your Eyes?

Cambermeister Wrote: May 30, 2012 12:37 AM
What's the sign of a stupendist column? When you argue a controversial issue and nobody will even try to bloviate a different postion.

You think you’ve seen and heard every argument regarding same-sex “marriage,” and then the Baltimore Sun writes an editorial that divorce has now somehow strengthened the case for same-sex “marriage.” The editorial pertained to the recent opinion of Maryland’s highest court in Port v. Cowan that said a same-sex couple with a marriage license from California could acquire a “divorce” in the Maryland courts.

Of course, this case could hardly be considered “litigation” or a bona fide legal dispute. Rather, it was yet another manufactured effort by those looking to redefine marriage by any means necessary, and Maryland’s high...