In response to:

Why Not Treat SCOTUS Opinions Like They Treat the Constitution?

camanintx Wrote: Jul 16, 2012 1:03 PM
Sorry Frank, but determining what is constitutional by popularity is not what the founding fathers had in mind when they wrote the Constitution. Maybe you should go back and brush up on your civics.

What if we all simply decided to interpret the 5-4 Supreme Court decision to uphold Obamacare as a 9-0 vote to overturn Obamacare?

“Well, that wouldn’t be right!” you say. “That wouldn’t respect the rule of law. People can’t just interpret laws anyway they want.”

Why not? That’s exactly what Chief Justice Roberts and the four liberals justices did in the Obamacare case. They either changed the meaning of Obamacare (Roberts) or changed the meaning of the Constitution (Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan) to pretend that there is no conflict between Obamacare and the Constitution.

I have a couple of questions: 1)...