1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Back to the Future: Part II

CallMeChuckles Wrote: Sep 14, 2011 12:11 AM
the reason dear sparcboy, was stated in the article, politicians don't care what works, they care what gets them re-elected.
Odin, you fail to produce any real argument . You just call people, 'zombies' and 'racist.'. You prove yourself unworthy of adult conversation. Your opinions are banal and worthless.
Odin - Typical. Leftist put words in the mouths of their ideological enemies, and then argue like their fictions really happened. Ransom doesn't call anyone 'boy'. Yet you argue like he has. Can you say, 'straw man'?
In response to:

Circumcision and the Special City

CallMeChuckles Wrote: Jun 02, 2011 12:01 PM
Once again, Liberals asinine 'moral equivalency' at work. Bob's statement is so rife with fallacy it's hard to know where to start. I didn't think it possible to pack so much rhetorical lunacy into so few words.
Very well written article. That's how it's done.
Don't forget Pablo Picasso! Another midget leftist who treated women like garbage. He was also an appalling father. He was an admirer of Stalin and a card carrying communist, yet he received piles and piles of money for cranking out 'art' that even my eleven-year-old recognizes as 'lame'. In spite of it all, he is beatified in the pantheon of liberal saints.
Compare this woman to Sarah Palin. Sarah gives inspiring speeches with humor and common sense. This woman shrieks an obvious lie over and over. This is the 'civil', 'educated', 'sophisticated' Left. Sarah, on the other hand, is a 'hick', a 'bimbo', a 'ditz' who needs to shut her mouth. We all know that if a conservative woman behaved this way, other conservatives would condemn her as a poor example. We have standards. No one on the left would speak against this woman. Instead, they would call her, 'impassioned', and 'committed' (*snicker*) Our culture hasn't sunk, it was dragged down, by these same people.
Wrong. Tea Party protesters are fightning to keep their own money. These 'teachers' are fighting to take other people's money.
Sky Pete, you hold the common Liberal fallacy of moral equivalence. The difference between these thugs and tea partiers, is that tea partiers are fighting for the right to keep their own money, while these thugs are fighting for the 'right' to take other people's money. When it comes to discerning right and wrong, Liberals will miss the obvious.
How naive you are. People like Napolitano are set for life. After Obama is ousted, she will end up with a cushy consulting job, and she will sit on boards with fat compensation packages, and receive huge speaking fees to give two minute talks and university commencment ceremonies. When Al Gore was vice president, he was worth two million dollars, now he sits on the board of Google and is worth 100 million dollars. Anyone know what he does for Google that is worth millions of dollars? Yeah -- that's what I thought.
1 - 10 Next