1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Silencing Diversity

cal652 Wrote: Jun 21, 2014 3:11 PM
The solution is fairly simple and can match the minority emphasis of our famous president. When on offence, the team will be the Whities; on defense, the (pick your favorite minority perjoritive) -ies.
As an engineer I find it truly amazing that a degree difference over ten years can generate ice fifteen feet thick or miles of open water.
In response to:

Majority Rules on Climate Science?

cal652 Wrote: Dec 06, 2013 2:03 PM
The IPCC charter is to examine human effects on climate change. As we used to say in R&D, when you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Where to geologists (dirt), biologists (flowers), and politicians (fraud) come off pontificating on the products of physics expertise? Everyone's entitled to their opinions but the credible are the physicists and engineers.
By blaming the Republicans, the president admits that the Democrats don't have all the ideas. Why then were the Republicans totally ignored while the ACA was being developed? I submit that it's not about health care. It's about laundering the wealth of the middle class thru an insurance system to the benefit of the helpless class.
In response to:

Peace In Our Time

cal652 Wrote: Nov 28, 2013 3:49 PM
The question is whether or not the Iranians, with their god of death, hit us with a single bomb and kill a few million or hit us with an EMP and watch millions starve to death. Remember, the president had defined a small number as 5%, about 15M w/o health insurance. With a million dead, I believe the president wouldn't even bother with a counterstrike.
I haven't heard anyone in Lake Placid complaining about the snow. In CO it'd be cause for a block party...
In response to:

Women in Combat

cal652 Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 2:32 PM
Don't even start on homosexuals and battlefield transfusions.
Obama '06 was objecting to the vote buying power of government spending BY REPUBLICANS.
In response to:

Al Gore Warming

cal652 Wrote: Jan 19, 2013 2:14 PM
This whole issue would have remained in the halls of academia, along with the 'universe contains 17 billion planets' headline, had it not been for two little words: carbon tax. A substantial amount of money has been spent on this issue, $28M in my relatively small state where $4M is a nice pound of pork.
Go to the public library and borrow Al Gore's Inconvient Truth movie. Look carefully at the graph of temperature and CO2 versus time. Note that temperature leads CO2 by about two hundred years. Therefore, the question should be why does increased temperature cause increased CO2 levels.
1 - 10 Next