In response to:

Marriage: A Supreme Test of Rights

ca7 Wrote: Mar 04, 2013 5:10 PM
"you mean you want the definition of marriage to change. why should it?" The definition has already been changed in 9 states and D.C. The federal government discriminates against gay couples when they treat their legal (in their state) marriages differently than any other marriages. The federal government should not be in the business of only recognizing some legal marriages while discriminating against other legal marriages. Your side is going to lose on this issue.

From the very beginning, homosexual “marriage” activists have sought to hijack not only the moral authority of the Civil Rights Movement, but also the legal arguments which liberated minorities from centuries of legalized oppression and discrimination.

After decades of aggressive activism, the common sense understanding of marriage has become almost hopelessly mired in incomprehensible legal terminology. It becomes difficult for everyday observers to navigate the convoluted logic homosexual activists employ as they attempt to remake one of civilization’s oldest institutions. The argument that redefining marriage to include homosexual couples is only “fair” rests on a specious interpretation of the equal protection...