In response to:

A False Sense of Security

ca7 Wrote: Dec 17, 2012 3:52 PM
"But in the long run, is it really doing anyone a service to pretend that there is a "one step" answer that will work, when evidence indicates -- over and over -- that it isn't one factor but many that result in this kind of evil and the resulting suffering? " 1. Neither Obama nor anyone else has suggested that there is a "one step" answer. 2. Of course there are many factors and nothing we can do will completely eliminate this kind of event from happening. 3. If there are many factors to take into consideration and the goal is to minimize the occurrence of tragedies and also minimize the casualties when tragedies do occur, then you do have to take at least a first step (followed by other steps) when trying to solve a serious problem.

This morning, when I took my children to school, there was a guard at the gate for the first time.  Obviously, the school intended it as a thoughtful gesture for anxious mothers.

But that's the point.  Most of the "solutions" being touted offer only a false sense of security.  To that point, Ron Fournier had a compelling piece in today's National Journal, titled "What If Nothing or Nobody is to Blame for Adam Lanza?"  Fournier writes:

What if there is nothing or nobody to blame? Would that make this inexplicable horror unbearable?

What if we didn't rush to judgement?...

Monday, May 20 | 01:52 PM ET
Monday, May 20 | 01:52 PM ET
Monday, May 20 | 01:52 PM ET
Monday, May 20 | 01:52 PM ET