In response to:

Lieberman/Collins: The Terrorist Threat Level in Benghazi Was “Flashing Red”

c301 Wrote: Jan 06, 2013 9:52 AM
My understanding is that this was NOT a consulate- merely some outpost. The question remains, why was Amb. Stevens at this remote location, essentially unprotected, on 9/11 anyway? What was he doing there? Why the continued "it's the video" cover up story? What are they hiding?
Tea Party in Wisconsin formerlyTea Party Wrote: Jan 06, 2013 11:34 AM
He was in charge of running the weapons from Libya that Ghadaffi had, while making a show of destroying them. Those were the unuseable weapons that were burned for the photo op, the working useable ones transhipped to Turkey to the al Queda in Syria. Why wouldn't he make sure the one doing his dirty work, Stevens couldn't talk, nor Smith. He and his cabal never took into account that men trained as the SEALS were would never stand down, THAT's not who they are, better men than he and the traitors in his regime could ever be.
Marc_H Wrote: Jan 06, 2013 10:03 AM
simple
he was set up to be killed by obama

Last week, former Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) and Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) published a damning joint op-ed in the Washington Times explaining -- among other things -- the myriad failures of the federal government to protect its diplomats at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya last September. And while none of the facts they cite in the article were previously unknown to the public, the findings from their congressional investigation are exceedingly difficult to stomach and worth repeating:

From the article:

We recently released the findings of our bipartisan report on the terrorist attack in Benghazi, which has...