“Nothing in my son's gay marriage will impact upon yours at all.” – Simple, it will when it is forced upon children in public schools because the gay activists insist that it must be portrayed up alongside heterosexual marriage as good and proper. Impact the children, impact the marriage. This is already being demonstrated in states where gay marriage has been legalized. The insistence of normalization does not stop with the recognition of their “marriage”. Please keep in mind before you say it, that not all people who have morals necessarily have the money to send their child to a private school or risk losing an income to home school them. Making this argument then restricts moral parenting (in the eyes of the parent) to the wealthy...

“Is she such a fragile flower that a word harms her?” – I find it odd that you expect her to have a thick skin against hurtful comments yet mourn your son’s scars from hurtful words. I suppose you may call this a double standard. No one ever said the “sticks and stones” saying had any truth.
“In my opinion, if you don't support your sister's right to full equal protection rights, then you may not hate her, but you don't love her enough to protect her rights. You make her a second class, unequal citizen. You force her to 'marry' someone to whom she has no attraction, and live a lie of a life.” – You may not ever see it this way but you must consider the fact that maybe she loves her sister so much that she is willing to undergo her...

I just spent about an hour reading all the comments so I felt like I needed to chime in.
Lorraineanne here are some of my replies to you –
"I've seen your posts before. The fact that you think there is someone/thing named Lucifer frankly disqualifies you as a rational human, but I'll respond nonetheless." - Ad hominem attack, take focus off of the argument and try to discredit the other person. A large majority of the gay movement does this. A person disagrees with gay marriage. Gay people find out this person is a Christian. Christian person gets called "godder" and "heterosexist" and "homophobe". Focus of argument thus shifted. As a side note, I really wish people would stop to think about what homophobe actually means, just...

“It is because in a very short time, when DOMA is undone, gay marriage is legal in all 50 states, and there is NOTHING you, Ms. California, or Dennis "I love divorce' Prager can do about it.”
– Again, ad hominem attack against Prager, but that isn’t the real reason I pulled this out. Many gay marriage supporters focus on the fact that divorce is legal and that gay marriage can’t do more harm than divorce has already done. I’m a firm believer that instead of focusing on legalizing things that “can’t be any worse”, why don’t we try to enact laws that make things better? The same argument is made “for the children”; i.e. that gay marriage and parenting can’t be any worse that the havoc that divorce deals or the trials of...