In response to:

Krauthammer Slams Obama Over Susan Rice Defense

C.H. Wrote: Nov 15, 2012 10:47 AM
Who was besmirching Susan Rice anyway? I think the reporter was trying to "take it up with Obama".
Free_Markets_Free_People Wrote: Nov 15, 2012 10:51 AM
Obama is always having straw man arguments and uses misdirection when answering questions and the MSM sits there in admiration. So much for the 4th estate.
C.H. Wrote: Nov 15, 2012 11:02 AM
Free: I think why Obama chose her is an interesting question. Is he trying to answer American sovereignty questions with the UN representative? I know she had her talking points, but anybody could've been given those.

He did attack Libya through UN forces, saying America would take a "back seat" to UN forces.

YassirSanchez Wrote: Nov 15, 2012 11:27 AM
My personal favorite are "ad hominem".

And the reporters just suck it up as one who is dying of thirst sucks down water.

It is really kind of pathetic watching them kowtow to him. These people have absolutely no pride or dignity. I think it is the first thing that they take away from you once you enter journalism school. Either that or your common sense,

As I reported yesterday, President Obama gave a full defense of UN Ambassador Susan Rice's explanation of the 9/11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. As a reminder, Rice went on five different Sunday shows five days after the attack and blamed the attack on a YouTube video despite the administration knew the attack was carried out by terrorists within 24 hours. President Obama said yesterday that Rice was simply following direction from the White House to present intelligence to the country that had been handed to her. Obama also said Rice had "nothing to do with Benghazi."

...