In response to:

Before Fully Assessing Contempt Citation, U.S. Attorney for D.C. Refuses to Hold Holder Accountable

BW22 Wrote: Jun 29, 2012 5:25 PM
Had you actually read or comprehended the decision, you would know that Obamacare was NOT found Constitutional on the basis that the personal mandate was a fee, rather, it was found that Congress has the power to create taxes. As a fine, it is Unconstitutional. Additionally, the other components were not decided upon as the personal mandate was sent to a lower court for further review. Also, to claim F&F never happened, or that Holder never withheld documents, just proves your ignorance on these matters. People like you vote for the people who disregard the Constitution and further drive our once great nation into the Welfare state abyss.
Joseph1790 Wrote: Jun 29, 2012 5:33 PM
Don't waste your time...Treason smokes dope, plays video games and lives with his Mom.

In a non-surprising move, the Department of Justice has just officially announced they will not proceed with prosecuting Attorney General Eric Holder after the House of Representatives voted to hold him in criminal and civil contempt of Congress yesterday.

The Justice Department moved Friday to shield Attorney General Eric Holder from prosecution after the House voted to hold him in contempt of Congress.

The contempt vote technically opened the door for the House to call on the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia to bring the case before a grand jury. But because...