In response to:

Museum Visit Reveals a lot of Uncertainties Within Darwinism

BuzWeston Wrote: Jun 27, 2012 2:16 PM
But there's more. Even if the fossil was complete, the fossil didn't leave any ancestors to examine. Lots of imagination is required tourists that story. And it goes on with the silly story about whales having the vestigial legs. These bones support the reproductive organs and are not connected to the spinal column. And yet this is commonly used as an example that proves evolution. I could literally go on for pages with this stuff. You can find it for yourself if you want to. But I'm pretty sure you have a psychological barrier that keeps you from wanting to know about problems with evolution.

I went to two New York City churches on the last Sunday morning of May: First a Christian one, then the American Museum of Natural History, a towering steeple within the Church of Darwin.

My first stopping point: The Spitzer Hall of Human Origins on the lower level, a dark and crowded chapel with hairy figures created to show man's purported hominid ancestry over several million years. Some parents were catechizing their young children: "Look, those are our relatives." (As I listened, one unbelieving girl, staring at the private parts of the hirsute mannequins, laughed, "We didn't come from them."...