In response to:

Museum Visit Reveals a lot of Uncertainties Within Darwinism

BuzWeston Wrote: Jun 27, 2012 2:10 PM
I suppose you are talking about evidence for evolution/creation, rather than my assertion about worlviews. Okay. Here's one: Ambulocetus. The claim is that this is a transitional fossil preceding a whale, but with legs. The fossil bits are from different strata and are too few to draw any such conclusion. Very creative people have filled in the missing bones and then went on to imaginately draw pictures of their imaginary transitional creature.

I went to two New York City churches on the last Sunday morning of May: First a Christian one, then the American Museum of Natural History, a towering steeple within the Church of Darwin.

My first stopping point: The Spitzer Hall of Human Origins on the lower level, a dark and crowded chapel with hairy figures created to show man's purported hominid ancestry over several million years. Some parents were catechizing their young children: "Look, those are our relatives." (As I listened, one unbelieving girl, staring at the private parts of the hirsute mannequins, laughed, "We didn't come from them."...