In response to:

Abortion and the Conscience of a Nation

BuzWeston Wrote: Oct 13, 2012 3:45 PM
You ask, "... the pregnant girl is what? A beast of burden?" No, she's a mother. And all mothers have a moral obligation to provide for and to protect their children. One may not kill their family members because they are inconvenienced by them.
t252 Wrote: Oct 15, 2012 12:18 PM
rich and others of his ilk are too stupid to realize the 16 cell blastula they are so worried about didn't just happen. It was caused by the actions of the mother.

Imagine for a moment that your home is invaded by thugs who will do harm to your family, or perhaps even kill them. But then one of them takes a look at your three children and offers you a sinister Faustian bargain: pick one to die and the others will be allowed to live.

Would you helplessly choose one of your own children to die so that the other two may live? Would you trust a person whose moral conscience is so far gone to even offer such a deal to live up to his end of it?

For...

Sunday, May 19 | 03:56 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 03:56 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 03:56 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 03:56 AM ET