1 - 10 Next
& no more booze & tobacco on food stamps.
In response to:

Liberals on the Lying Frequency

ButchLyons Wrote: Aug 26, 2012 1:58 PM
In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is, "I inherited a deficit that I voted for, And then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th, 2009." There is no way this will be widely publicized unless each of us passes it on. "The problems we face today exist because the people who WORK for a living are outnumbered by those who VOTE for a living."
In response to:

Liberals on the Lying Frequency

ButchLyons Wrote: Aug 26, 2012 1:58 PM
And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete 2009. Let's remember what the deficits looked like during that period: If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending. After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets. If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself.
In response to:

Liberals on the Lying Frequency

ButchLyons Wrote: Aug 26, 2012 1:56 PM
Budgets do not come from the White House. They come from Congress and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democratic Party. Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 & 2009 as well as 2010 & 2011. In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases. For 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the 2009 budget.
In response to:

Liberals on the Lying Frequency

ButchLyons Wrote: Aug 26, 2012 1:54 PM
(BTW: Bush asked Congress 17 times to stop Fannie & Freddie -starting in 2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy).Barney blocked it and called it a "Chicken Little Philosophy" (and the sky did fall!) And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac? OBAMA And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie? OBAMA and the Democrat Congress, especially BARNEY!!!! So when someone tries to blame Bush... REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007....THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!" Bush may have been in the car but the Democrats were in charge of the gas pedal and steering wheel they were driving the economy into the ditch.
In response to:

Liberals on the Lying Frequency

ButchLyons Wrote: Aug 26, 2012 1:49 PM
Remember that day... January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee. The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy? BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES! THANK YOU DEMOCRATS (especially Barney) for taking us from 13,000 DOW, 3.5% GDP and 4.6% Unemployment...to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOES!
In response to:

Liberals on the Lying Frequency

ButchLyons Wrote: Aug 26, 2012 1:46 PM
Lori Ehricke REMEMBER JAN. 3, 2007 The day the Democrats took over was not January 22nd 2009, it was January 3rd 2007, the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, the start of the 110th Congress. The Democratic Party gained a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995. For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is "Bush's Fault," think about this: January 3rd, 2007, the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress: The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77 The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5% The Unemployment rate was 4.6% George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB CREATION!
ALSO: If you can keep big media screaming how close the election is, it would be very hard to argue after the fact. The software could be set to go into effect on a preset date & time. It could also turn itself off late in the day, & erase itself. Leaving no trace. Tiz something to think about.
Truman said, "The Buck Stops Here" It could be said that he controls everything in the country from there. That would mean that all of the electronic voting machines, are under the Presidents control either directly or indirectly. Now that thought is scary to me!! With today's tech almost anything can be done. Most states are mostly understood as to red or blue. So you would only need to control a few states to swing the vote your way. Possibly you could do it with just one. Think Wisconsin, Ohio, or Florida. In today's climate if a person could rig a couple of them, that could be all it takes to change the outcome of the presidency. They could be rigged, so that all they would do, is win by a few % points.
Also:Take a good look at Mexico they have always had gun control. If you notice the police have guns, the army has guns, & the outlaws have guns. Now if you look closely you will see that the civilians, that are not allowed to have guns do way more dying than anyone else.
1 - 10 Next