In response to:

Government Scientist Gets Fired for Telling the Truth

BuffaloBillie Wrote: Jan 19, 2013 11:58 AM
I've read a LOT of these posts and I'd like to say one thing which I think is cogent. Most of you call them "progressives". Actually, I think socialist/communist/fascist/liberal fits better. When you say "progressive", people interpret it as being a person who's "hip", modern, up-to-date, etc. Actually, they're out to ruin our wonderful country. This new description sounds far too "politically correct".
ppotts Wrote: Jan 19, 2013 1:39 PM
thats exactly what they are communists, no doubt about it. lets put a name on the enemy, then we know what we are dealing with

Something’s amiss at the Department of Interior. Eight government scientists were recently fired or reassigned after voicing concerns to their superiors about faulty environmental science used for policy decisions. Which begs the question, “Are some government agencies manipulating science to advance political agendas?”

Fictional book authors operate in a convenient world, unconstrained by facts and experiences of the real world. The antithesis of works of fiction are scientific findings solely based on provable facts and experience. For agenda-driven environmental science, facts can sometime prove inconvenient. It’s far easier to advance an agenda with agreeable science, even if that means creating science...