In response to:

Petraeus: We Knew Benghazi Was Terrorism "Almost Immediately"

Buck O Wrote: Nov 16, 2012 1:56 PM
You tell us why, moron, when he later said, "There is no video that justifies an attack on an embassy." What embassy was he talking about, fool?
Steve276 Wrote: Nov 16, 2012 2:08 PM
This building was not an Embassy, not even a "mission." It was a CIA stronghold. What was our Ambassador doing there to begin with? Preliminary information is that they were there to finalize deals to provide arms for the Syrian rebels, who were known to include people affiliated with Al Queda and Hezsbolah. If it turns out to be true, that would be the reason for all the lying and attempts to cover up the whole fiasco. Our government arming our enemies in an attempt to topple Assad in Syria, is the real story behind the deaths and cover up.

CNN landed the scoop regarding what former CIA Director and four star general David Petraeus is telling members of Congress behind closed doors today:

CNN reports that former Central Intelligence Agency director David H. Petraeus wants to tell Congress that he knew “almost immediately” that the attack on the U.S. Mission in Benghazi was perpetrated by terrorists. According to the source, reports attributing the attack to protests surrounding an anti-Islam video and protests in Cairo were not disproven until after Petraeus made his initial report to Congress. Despite that, according to CNN, Petraeus had separate talking points from Rice’s...