1 - 10 Next
we are required to recognize the fact that our president is black, that that is an indication to prove we have turned around racism in our country. fine. now how about recognizing that Southerners can be proud of their heritage, the bravery and resourcefulness of the Southern States and its people, without assuming it is a racist statement. sure, some will say they are "offended", but that requires believing that that flag is a symbol of racism to its proponents. and by restricting our freedom of speech, we can't even Talk about the difference. this insult to the constitution, like racism, is wrong
In response to:

Sex and the Military

bsheppard Wrote: Jun 18, 2013 9:32 AM
we've been so PCed to death that no one here would dare examine the big part of the problem: we KNEW we would have big problems with the Women in the Military debacle, this abuse stuff is just one of them. men socialize well together, interject females into the mix and testosterone takes over. it increases aggressive behavior. it is a morale killer. it unquestionably reduces unit effectiveness. we all realize these things, yet we've been told that FAIRNESS and EQUAL OPPORTUNITY vis a vis female billets is more important than having the best military we can muster. so here it comes, folks: more lectures, more restrictions, more scrutiny, more behavior review, more "leadership". keep pushing the rope congresspeople, obama, DOD, because we all know this insanity is forever. here's a suggestion gaining popularity by the minute: START PHASING WOMEN OUT OF THE MILITARY NOW
In response to:

Sex and the Military

bsheppard Wrote: Jun 18, 2013 9:27 AM
where did you hear that? when their backs were against the wall they needed everyone to participate in israel's defense. a while back, the women were dropped from the front lines. recently, an ALL-WOMAN combat battalion was created and even functioned honorably in a squirmish. so maybe if we keep individual ships, squadrons, battalions SEGREGATED that would work? is that what you're referring to?
In response to:

More to Learn about Lerner's Abuses

bsheppard Wrote: Jun 14, 2013 6:51 AM
if lerner doesn't want to do her JOB and refuses to defend herself for NOT providing information about the IRS to congress, well, that would seem to be enough evidence to FIRE HER. the 5th amendment only guarantees that you cannot be forced to defend yourself with your own statements. it is NOT some dumb form of amnesty. DO YOUR JOB LERNER OR GO HOME
i agree. there's no one stupid enough to force women on an NFL/NBA/NHL/MLB playing field. why would we want women on the battlefield?
start phasing women out of the military, now. told you so
is that furbarack any relation to our president, Ovomit?
well, you're right about one thing, the union workers i've been associated with have been LOUSY, generally speaking
are you done? nice job trying to trash this page with your infantile garbage. grow the F up
what a hateful piece of c**p you are. anyone with a "basic moral understanding" would certainly avoid such discriminatory remarks as Ridiculous as yours
1 - 10 Next