Previous 11 - 20 Next
Ever since there were first USSR Communists in the world, let's say roughly around 1920, they have been targeting American education. At every level. Coming from every direction. Hundreds of front groups. And that's why in 1983 the "Nation at Risk" report concluded that our public schools seem to have been designed by a "hostile foreign nation." They were. They still are. There could not be any other logical explanation for how we can spend so many billions of dollars and still have lousy schools. In the same way that Obama is pretending to engage in a war against Muslims, our Education Establishment pretends to engage in the education of American children.
It's not just black kids. Public schools are designed to dumb down everybody who comes in the door. This is such a huge issue, and the media pay no attention to it. Whole Word guarantees you won't learn to read. Reform Math guarantees you won't be able to do arithmetic. Constructivism guarantees you won't learn any facts. There is a long list of bogus theories and methods. If the public understood how destructive these things are, we can turn the schools around in no time. Last week I put up a piece called "Common Core fulfills an ugly dream," making the point that all the things we see now have been in progress for a century. If somebody wants any of these issues explained, please contact me. Bruce Deitrick Price
Another phony front group pretending to be objective and deeply concerned with the public's welfare but actually pushing its own secret agenda at every turn. Pronounce this acronym "Nasty." (I think people have no idea how many scores of foundations work tirelessly every day to defeat what this country needs, i.e., practical, traditional education where children actually learn to read, do arithmetic, and all the rest.)
Notice the dip in ed spending around 2008. Then Obama got in there and threw money at anybody who might conceivably be a loyalist. Common Core is turning a lot of people off. Let's use that momentum to roll back everything: the Department of Education, the National Education Association, and all the phony front groups like the National Council of Teachers of English. Bill Gates gave money to 25 foundations, etc., all these groups pretending to be concerned about the public good but doing everything possible to give the government more power. @educatt
I applaud Larry Elder for writing this. Holder is bad enough on an average day. But now we're eight weeks before elections. And the Democrats are eager to sacrifice that Missouri cop if they can extract a dozen extra votes from doing so. (Michael Brown's friend told a lot of lies right off the bat, stuff about the cop reaching out the window and grabbing this 300-pound man into the car. Through the window? Analytical types need to analyze that testimony. A cop by himself is not going to grab that huge guy.
Michael Brown was not a hero. Only a corrupt black leadership and a corrupt media like the New York Times would allow all the false versions of the story to be propagated. Everybody in America should see the video from the convenience store. Michael Brown is a thief and a bully. It's clear that's what he is, but he does not care. I don't know if it's drugs or what, but he was in another world of his own. A world where he could casually break the law; and a few minutes later, that's what he was doing. We are asked to believe that a cop intentionally pulled a 300-pound man into the car with him. How many times every million years could that happen?
Here is the question you should be exploring. If Malloy loses, what does it mean for the Sandy Hook "official story"? Many people see a hoax there. Many others see a very flawed official account. Whichever it is, Malloy knows what really happened. With him gone, expect to see rats fleeing the ship.
To Derek re: "It’s clear the White House has not been interested in the threat posed by ISIS." My impression is that Obama is interested in helping them. Please confirm or deny. Beyond that, he is intensely interested in trying to play both sides against the middle and somehow not look like a traitor. Personally, I don't think he's pulling it off. I sense the distinct whiff of Benedict Obama. What do you think?
Would you please address the issue of whether he's actually trying to help ISIS. If he is really a pal of the Muslim Brotherhood, then we are not seeing incompetence here but treason. He went to such lengths to put the Muslim Brotherhood back in power in Egypt after the people there threw them out. That made a big impression on me. It was obviously extremely important to Obama that he reverse what the Egyptian people clearly wanted. Then when he focused on Syria a year ago, he immediately tried to help the Muslim Brotherhood win there.
Okay, we know that Obama will act lawlessly to help his schemes. What I don't understand is why we don't bring even a pocket knife to a knife fight. I've read 500 articles about Obama over the years, and it really does seem true that his name in Indonesia was Barry Soetoro, he was fluent in Arabic and probably raised a Muslim (David Horowitz says he still is), his parents were probably both self- described Communists, he was still Barry when he got to Hawaii, he was mentored there by a lifelong Communist zealot named Frank Marshall Davis, he is probably still an Indonesian citizen named Barry Soetoro as nobody has shown any paperwork suggesting he changed his status, he probably went to those fancy schools as a foreign student and that's why he hides all of his paperwork as Donald Trump has argued, he did claim on his literary site for a decade that he was born in Kenya, he did go to Arab countries after he was elected and bow to some leaders there, not just bow but almost kiss the floor, his birth certificate has been declared by many experts a digital forgery, and the list just goes on and on and on. Ask Larry Sinclair to speak about that. But think back to Dan Rather with his forgery about Bush's National Guard activities, a forgery so obvious that anyone who has any connection to graphic design would see it immediately, and yet Rather and his network went with this fake story for WEEKS. Meanwhile, the rest of the country can't get a true story printed for a day about Obama's known fakery. It just doesn't seem fair. Rush, Rove, and the rest have to present this story now and then.
In response to:

America: The Ostrich Years

Bruce Deitrick Price Wrote: Aug 25, 2014 3:32 PM
I'm not so sure about this analysis. Obama may know exactly what he is doing, i.e., trying to help his friends in the Muslim Brotherhood. The ostrich in this cartoon is us. There are 10 things that should take Obama out of play and out of office. But we ignore them. There is a day or a week of bad press and then everything fades to silence. Just yesterday I was musing over the fact that a guy with an exotic foreign name wants to run for president but doesn't bother to have a birth certificate (2007). Even several years later all he's got is an obviously forged computer printout of some kind. So his czars go back to work and come up with a real birth certificate – because Trump is putting a lot of pressure on him – but all the digital experts say it also is an obvious forgery. So he's never been president. So who's the ostrich???
Previous 11 - 20 Next