1 - 10 Next
To Derek re: "It’s clear the White House has not been interested in the threat posed by ISIS." My impression is that Obama is interested in helping them. Please confirm or deny. Beyond that, he is intensely interested in trying to play both sides against the middle and somehow not look like a traitor. Personally, I don't think he's pulling it off. I sense the distinct whiff of Benedict Obama. What do you think?
Would you please address the issue of whether he's actually trying to help ISIS. If he is really a pal of the Muslim Brotherhood, then we are not seeing incompetence here but treason. He went to such lengths to put the Muslim Brotherhood back in power in Egypt after the people there threw them out. That made a big impression on me. It was obviously extremely important to Obama that he reverse what the Egyptian people clearly wanted. Then when he focused on Syria a year ago, he immediately tried to help the Muslim Brotherhood win there.
Okay, we know that Obama will act lawlessly to help his schemes. What I don't understand is why we don't bring even a pocket knife to a knife fight. I've read 500 articles about Obama over the years, and it really does seem true that his name in Indonesia was Barry Soetoro, he was fluent in Arabic and probably raised a Muslim (David Horowitz says he still is), his parents were probably both self- described Communists, he was still Barry when he got to Hawaii, he was mentored there by a lifelong Communist zealot named Frank Marshall Davis, he is probably still an Indonesian citizen named Barry Soetoro as nobody has shown any paperwork suggesting he changed his status, he probably went to those fancy schools as a foreign student and that's why he hides all of his paperwork as Donald Trump has argued, he did claim on his literary site for a decade that he was born in Kenya, he did go to Arab countries after he was elected and bow to some leaders there, not just bow but almost kiss the floor, his birth certificate has been declared by many experts a digital forgery, and the list just goes on and on and on. Ask Larry Sinclair to speak about that. But think back to Dan Rather with his forgery about Bush's National Guard activities, a forgery so obvious that anyone who has any connection to graphic design would see it immediately, and yet Rather and his network went with this fake story for WEEKS. Meanwhile, the rest of the country can't get a true story printed for a day about Obama's known fakery. It just doesn't seem fair. Rush, Rove, and the rest have to present this story now and then.
In response to:

America: The Ostrich Years

Bruce Deitrick Price Wrote: Aug 25, 2014 3:32 PM
I'm not so sure about this analysis. Obama may know exactly what he is doing, i.e., trying to help his friends in the Muslim Brotherhood. The ostrich in this cartoon is us. There are 10 things that should take Obama out of play and out of office. But we ignore them. There is a day or a week of bad press and then everything fades to silence. Just yesterday I was musing over the fact that a guy with an exotic foreign name wants to run for president but doesn't bother to have a birth certificate (2007). Even several years later all he's got is an obviously forged computer printout of some kind. So his czars go back to work and come up with a real birth certificate – because Trump is putting a lot of pressure on him – but all the digital experts say it also is an obvious forgery. So he's never been president. So who's the ostrich???
If something weird, quasi-illegal, and helpful to Obama happens, assume he ordered it. You'll be right more often than not. I assume these riots in Missouri have been allowed to fester for so long because Obama wants in that way. There is no excuse for allowing so much destruction of property, not after the first few days. So I suspect Obama feels that all of this violence will arouse his base. Ergo, keep the violence going. David Horowitz takes a look at the inside of Pres. Obama's psyche. Scary. http://www.redstate.com/diary/davidhorowitz/2014/08/18/hell-obama-white-house/
Not just English but Standard English. It needs to be taught clearly and correctly. None of this descriptive-only nonsense. Later the kids can mangle the language if they want. But in the beginning they are entitled to know what the best educated, most successful people are doing. (I just reviewed Weird Al's very entertaining Word Crimes and some of the background issues, all of which connect nicely to the Texas story: http://www.examiner.com/review/word-crimes-weird-al-rescues-grammar-from-clueless-education-establishment ) .
And so we have to ask the question, who is still supporting Obama? We can understand that black Americans, gay Americans, and quasi-Commie Americans would like this guy. We can understand that people who think welfare is a career option would like this guy. But I'll bet that's not even 20 or 25%. So how do the polls keep showing 40% approval? Do they skewer the sample so it consists entirely of Democrats? Are they using every trick in the book to keep the percentage above 39? Let's get some honest polls. How many think the country would be better off if Obama had never been elected? How many think he hasn't presented a real birth certificate? How many think he's gay? how many think he's Muslim? We're surrounded by lies and staged events. It's more important than ever to get the facts out.
I wish Townhall would explain that when only 7% of Americans approve Congress, or whatever the number is, this is not the same as saying that only 30% approve Obama, or whatever that number is. The 90% who disapprove of Congress are split into two hugely different groups. And the biggest group is people mad at Congress because they're not controlling Obama. So that 7% number tells more about how many people are angry at Obama than anything else. People want him reined in and Congress doesn't seem to know how to do it.
That white flag on the Brooklyn Bridge.... Is that meant to symbolize Obama's America? I think he would be comfortable with that.
Fire Reid, for starters.....Then Eric Holder.....Then the whole gang. I agree with a comment below that this is a good sign: some Republicans are showing cleverness and the ability to fight. We need a lot more of that.
1 - 10 Next