In response to:

Education: Too Important for a Government Monopoly

Brittany27 Wrote: Feb 23, 2010 5:30 PM
The problem begins with the statement that "we spend a stunning $11,000 a year per student -- more than $200,000 per classroom". The federal money is given to the state. The state uses more than half the money at the state level, then distributes the rest to the counties. The county board of education uses more than half of that money as they see ... See Morefit, and dictates how each school must use half of the money they receive. The reality is that most of the money never makes it to the classroom because people who never see a child control the way the money is spent, as opposed to allowing schools to use the money to address the individual needs of their school population. For example, in a middle school of 1100 students (8 science...

The government-school establishment has said the same thing for decades: Education is too important to leave to the competitive market. If we really want to help our kids, we must focus more resources on the government schools.

But despite this mantra, the focus is on something other than the kids. When The Washington Post asked George Parker, head of the Washington, D.C., teachers union, about the voucher program there, he said: "Parents are voting with their feet. ... As kids continue leaving the system, we will lose teachers. Our very survival depends on having kids in D.C. schools so we'll...